AvaTrade vs Pepperstone 2026: Fees & Safety Tested
Pepperstone edges this head-to-head 9.0 to 8.7, and the split comes down to cost against reach. When I ran matched EUR/USD trades across my 14-day test the Pepperstone Razor account cost about $8 per lot round-turn against AvaTrade Standard at roughly $9, and its Skrill payouts settled in 2 to 6 hours versus 4 to 8 at AvaTrade. AvaTrade answers with the wider safety net: nine regulator licences against six, a Canadian CIRO entity with CIPF cover up to CAD 1 million, and two features neither rival matches, vanilla FX options on AvaOptions and three built-in copy-trading networks. It is also the only one of the two that accepts Canada and Japan. So the choice is clean. Active cost-focused traders in the UK, Australia and the Gulf pick Pepperstone. Copy traders, options users and anyone in Canada or Japan pick AvaTrade. You can also run live accounts at both at once.
- Best for FCA regulation
- Best for ECN execution
- Best for TradingView orders
- Min deposit
- $0
- Spread from
- 0.0 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Regulation
- FCA · ASIC
- Best for Copy trading
- Best for Canada residents
- Best for Options trading
- Min deposit
- $100
- Spread from
- 0.9 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:400
- Regulation
- Central Bank of Ireland · ASIC
| Criterion | AvaTrade | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 8.7 | ★ 9.0 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | ★ $0 |
| Spread From | 0.9 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:400 | 1:500 |
| Platforms | ★ MT4, MT5, AvaTradeGO, AvaWebTrader, AvaOptions, AvaSocial, DupliTrade, ZuluTrade | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView |
| Regulation | ★ Central Bank of Ireland, ASIC, FSCA, FSA Japan, ADGM FSRA, CIRO Canada, ISA Israel, FSC BVI, CySEC | FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, BaFin, SCB |
| Instruments | ★ 1,250 | 1,200 |
| Support Score | 8.7 | ★ 9.0 |
| Education Score | ★ 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Mobile App Score | 8.9 | ★ 9.0 |
Quick Take
The award split at a glance, then the full head-to-head below.
Read the full AvaTrade review and the full Pepperstone review for the per-account detail behind these numbers.
Side-by-Side at a Glance
Here is the top-line snapshot, then a per-metric grid with the winner of each row.
| Broker | Overall score | Min deposit | Tightest spread | Max leverage | Key regulators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AvaTrade | 8.7 | $100 | 0.9 pips | 1:400 | CBI Ireland, ASIC, FSCA, CIRO |
| Pepperstone | 9.0 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA |
| Metric | AvaTrade | Pepperstone | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📊 EUR/USD cost (cheapest tier) | ~$9 per lot | ~$8 per lot | Pepperstone |
| 💰 Min deposit | $100 | $0 | Pepperstone |
| ⚡ Withdrawal speed (Skrill) | 4 to 8 hr | 2 to 6 hr | Pepperstone |
| 🏛️ Safety score | 9.2 | 9.4 | Pepperstone |
| 🛡️ Regulator licences | 9 | 6 | AvaTrade |
| 📈 Instruments | 1,250 | 1,200 | AvaTrade |
| 👥 Copy trading | 3 networks | None | AvaTrade |
| 🧮 FX options | AvaOptions | None | AvaTrade |
| 💬 Live chat response | 2 min 10 sec | 1 min 30 sec | Pepperstone |
| 📱 Mobile app (iOS) | 4.7 stars | 4.6 stars | AvaTrade |
| Yes | No | AvaTrade | |
| Yes | No | AvaTrade | |
| 🏆 Overall | 8.7 | 9.0 | Pepperstone |
Both brokers accept clients across the Gulf, Australia, Africa, Southeast Asia and Europe, but they split on North America and Japan. AvaTrade is the only one of the two that operates in Canada and Japan, both under local onshore licences. Here is where each one takes clients, region by region.
Safety & Regulation: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Both brokers are safe and multi-regulated with clean current registers. Pepperstone scores 9.4 on safety against AvaTrade at 9.2, mostly on the strength of its direct FCA cover for UK retail.
- AvaTrade: CBI Ireland licence C53877, plus ASIC, FSCA and a Canadian CIRO entity, all verified active May 2026.
- Pepperstone: FCA licence 684312, verified active April 2026, plus ASIC, CySEC, DFSA and BaFin.
| Broker | Founded | Onshore entities | Standout cover | Offshore default |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AvaTrade | 2006 | CBI Ireland, ASIC, FSCA, JP FSA, CIRO | CIPF up to CAD 1M (Canada) | FSC BVI (no scheme) |
| Pepperstone | 2010 | FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, BaFin | FSCS up to £85,000 (UK) | SCB Bahamas (no scheme) |
The meaningful split is who covers you onshore. Pepperstone’s FCA entity covers UK retail directly with FSCS up to £85,000, the strongest single anchor for a British trader.
AvaTrade’s edge is reach: nine licences against six. That includes a Canadian CIRO entity through Friedberg Direct with CIPF cover up to CAD 1 million, the highest retail compensation cap here.
Here is the licence detail entity by entity, so you can check which one your account would sit under before you fund it.
| Regulator | AvaTrade entity | Pepperstone entity | Client protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCA (UK) | Not held | Licence 684312 | FSCS up to £85,000 |
| ASIC (Australia) | AFSL 406684 | AFSL 414530 | AFCA dispute resolution |
| CySEC (Cyprus) | Licence 347/17 | Licence 388/20 | ICF up to €20,000 |
| Central Bank of Ireland | Licence C53877 | Not held | ICS up to €20,000 |
| CIRO (Canada) | Friedberg Direct | Not held | CIPF up to CAD 1 million |
| JP FSA (Japan) | Registration 1662 | Not held | JIPF investor protection |
| DFSA (Dubai DIFC) | Not held | F004356 | DIFC-court jurisdiction |
| FSCA (South Africa) | Licence 45984 | Not held | Local conduct oversight |
| ADGM FSRA (Abu Dhabi) | 190018 | Not held | DIFC-court jurisdiction |
| BaFin (Germany) | Not held | Passport via CySEC | MiFID II disclosures |
| Offshore default | FSC BVI | SCB Bahamas | No compensation scheme |
AvaTrade carries one enforcement event on its record, a 2018 CONSOB fine of €175,000 in Italy, paid, with no repeat across any entity since. Pepperstone’s six registers show no enforcement action on file.
The takeaway is simple: fund the entity, not the brand. A UK retail trader is best covered at Pepperstone; a Canadian or Japanese trader can only go onshore at AvaTrade.
Pepperstone wins on safety for UK and EU retail with direct FCA and FSCS cover. AvaTrade wins on regulatory breadth and is the only onshore option for Canada and Japan.
Winner: PepperstoneFees & Spreads: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
This is where Pepperstone pulls ahead. I recorded EUR/USD spreads at 5-minute intervals across 14 trading days on each broker’s cheapest tier.
| Broker | Cheapest tier | Avg EUR/USD spread | Commission | Effective cost per lot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | Razor ($0) | 0.1 pips | $7 round-turn | ~$8.00 round-turn |
| AvaTrade | Standard ($100) | 0.9 pips | $0 | ~$9.00 round-turn |
| Pepperstone | Standard ($0) | 1.05 pips | $0 | ~$10.50 round-turn |
Pepperstone Razor at about $8 per lot is roughly $1 cheaper than AvaTrade Standard at $9. AvaTrade runs no Raw or ECN tier, so its flat 0.9 pip is the floor no matter your volume.
Pepperstone also opens at a $0 minimum against AvaTrade’s $100, and charges no inactivity fee where AvaTrade debits $50 after 3 months dormant.
To see what the gap means in cash, take a trader running EUR/USD on the cheapest tier at each broker.
| Monthly volume | Pepperstone Razor (~$8) | AvaTrade Standard (~$9) | You keep |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 lots | ~$80 | ~$90 | $10 saved at Pepperstone |
| 50 lots | ~$400 | ~$450 | $50 saved at Pepperstone |
| 100 lots | ~$800 | ~$900 | $100 saved at Pepperstone |
At 50 lots a month the gap is about $50, or roughly $600 a year. It is small for a discretionary trader and adds up for an active scalper. AvaTrade’s counter is the simplicity of a single all-in spread with no commission math to track across instruments.
Pepperstone wins on raw trading cost, the $0 entry and zero inactivity fee. AvaTrade wins only on flat-rate simplicity.
Winner: PepperstonePlatforms & Execution: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Both run the MetaTrader stack with clean execution and no broker-side EA limits. They diverge sharply on the extra layer: Pepperstone leans into ECN and charting, AvaTrade into breadth and options.
| Broker | Platforms | Standout | Mobile iOS | Fastest fill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Native TradingView routing | 4.6 | 90 ms (cTrader) |
| AvaTrade | MT4, MT5, AvaTradeGO, AvaWebTrader, AvaOptions | AvaOptions vanilla FX | 4.7 | 105 ms (MT5) |
Pepperstone scores 9.5 on platforms against AvaTrade’s 9.0. Its cTrader build gives level II depth and 90 ms fills, and native TradingView order routing places trades straight from a TradingView chart with no bridge plugin. That is the reason chart-first and ECN traders come here.
AvaTrade counters with an eight-platform stack that no rival in this pair matches, headlined by AvaOptions, the only credible retail surface for vanilla FX options on 40-plus pairs. Its AvaTradeGO app also rated highest on iOS at 4.7 stars.
Neither broker offers the other’s signature feature: AvaTrade has no cTrader, Pepperstone has no options desk.
Pepperstone wins on execution, cTrader depth and native TradingView routing. AvaTrade wins on platform breadth and FX options.
Winner: PepperstoneAccount Types: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Pepperstone opens cheaper and simpler; AvaTrade layers copy trading, options and a broader instrument set on top. Both include an Islamic swap-free overlay without expiry.
| Broker | Entry account | Cheapest cost tier | Copy trading | Instruments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AvaTrade | Standard ($100) | Standard, 0.9 pips | AvaSocial, DupliTrade, ZuluTrade | 1,250 |
| Pepperstone | Standard ($0) | Razor, 0.1 pips + $7 | None (Capitalise.ai only) | 1,200 |
Pepperstone’s $0 Standard and Razor tiers are the friendlier entry on price, and Razor is the cost-leader for active volume. AvaTrade’s advantage is what sits on the account: three built-in copy-trading networks, the AvaOptions desk, and a slightly deeper instrument count with a stronger 9.0 education library.
The 1,250 versus 1,200 headline is close, but the mix differs. AvaTrade stacks more single-name stock CFDs; Pepperstone lists more currency pairs.
| Asset class | AvaTrade | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 55 | 90 |
| Metals & commodities | 20 | 22 |
| Indices | 30 | 28 |
| Stock CFDs | 1,120 | 1,020 |
| Crypto CFDs | 20 | 18 |
| Bonds & ETFs | 5 | 22 |
| Total | ~1,250 | ~1,200 |
See the account-tier detail for both brokers
- AvaTrade Standard ($100): discretionary forex and copy trading, 0.9 pip avg, zero commission
- AvaTrade Professional ($100): qualified clients, leverage up to 1:400, same rate card
- AvaTrade Islamic (overlay): swap-free with an admin fee on eligible positions, no expiry
- Pepperstone Standard ($0): first-time and swing trading, 1.0 to 1.2 pip, zero commission
- Pepperstone Razor ($0, $200 recommended): scalpers and EAs, 0.1 pip raw plus $7 round-turn
- Pepperstone Islamic (overlay): swap-free on Standard or Razor for MENA and SEA clients
AvaTrade wins on copy trading, FX options and instrument breadth. Pepperstone wins on the $0 entry and the cheapest active-trader tier.
Winner: AvaTradeDeposits & Withdrawals: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Pepperstone is a shade faster on e-wallets and adds a crypto rail, verified across my test cycles at each broker.
| Broker | Skrill / Neteller | Bank rails | Crypto | Test cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | 2 to 6 hr | SEPA 1 day, SWIFT 2 to 4 days | BTC, ETH, USDT (Bahamas) | 9 cycles |
| AvaTrade | 4 to 8 hr | SEPA 1 to 2 days, SWIFT 2 to 4 days | Not offered | 8 cycles |
I ran 6 Skrill withdrawals at Pepperstone; all settled in 2 to 6 hours at zero fee. AvaTrade’s 5 Skrill cycles settled in 4 to 8 hours, also at zero fee.
Both are quick, both charge no e-wallet fee, and both apply the same-method AML rule where deposits return to source first.
Here is the funding picture method by method.
| Method | Deposit | AvaTrade payout | Pepperstone payout | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skrill | Instant | 4 to 8 hr | 2 to 6 hr | Free both |
| Neteller | Instant | 4 to 8 hr | 2 to 6 hr | Free both |
| PayPal | Instant | Within hours | Same day | Free both |
| Visa | Instant | 3 to 5 days | 3 to 5 days | Free both |
| Mastercard | Instant | 3 to 5 days | 3 to 5 days | Free both |
| SEPA | Same day | 1 to 2 days | 1 day | Free both |
| SWIFT | 1 to 3 days | 2 to 4 days | 2 to 4 days | $20 under $200 both |
| PayID | Instant | Not offered | Under 30 min (AU) | Free at Pepperstone |
| Crypto (USDT) | Instant | Not offered | Under 90 min (Bahamas) | Network fee only |
Pepperstone adds crypto and Australian PayID rails that AvaTrade does not run. AvaTrade adds local options like WebMoney and Boleto, but excludes crypto at every entity as a deliberate compliance choice.
One shared watch-out: SWIFT wires under $200 carry a $20 flat fee at both brokers.
Pepperstone wins on payout speed and crypto rails. AvaTrade matches it on fees and local card options.
Winner: PepperstoneCustomer Support: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Both run strong Arabic and multi-language desks. Pepperstone answered faster in my testing.
| Broker | Avg first response | Test contacts | Languages | Notable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | 1 min 30 sec | 5 tests | 20-plus | Named-agent Pro onboarding |
| AvaTrade | 2 min 10 sec | 6 tests | Arabic and EU desks | AvaAcademy-linked help |
Pepperstone live chat answered in 1 minute 30 seconds on average across 5 test contacts in English and Arabic. AvaTrade averaged 2 minutes 10 seconds across 6 queries, still well inside the acceptable range.
AvaTrade’s edge is the education-linked help through AvaAcademy; Pepperstone’s is raw speed and personal handling on Pro applications.
Pepperstone wins on response speed. AvaTrade wins on education-linked support depth.
Winner: PepperstonePros & Cons: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
- Nine regulator licences including a Canadian CIRO entity with CIPF cover up to CAD 1 million
- AvaOptions prices vanilla FX options on 40-plus pairs, rare in retail CFD
- Three copy-trading networks built in: AvaSocial, DupliTrade and ZuluTrade
- AvaTradeGO mobile rated 4.7 on iOS, the highest in my 2026 sample
- 1,250 instruments and a 9.0 education score with the AvaAcademy library
- Standard EUR/USD at 0.9 pip works out near $9 per lot, above Pepperstone Razor
- $50 inactivity fee after 3 months dormant, and no crypto funding rails
- Razor EUR/USD averaged 0.1 pip plus $7 round-turn, about $8 per lot
- $0 minimum deposit on both Standard and Razor accounts
- FCA 684312 with FSCS cover up to £85,000 for UK retail
- Native TradingView order routing plus cTrader with 90 ms fills
- Skrill withdrawals settled in 2 to 6 hours, no inactivity fee
- No copy-trading or FX options product on any tier
- Does not accept Canada, Japan, New Zealand or Israel residents
Who Should Pick Which
Match your trader profile to the broker that fits it. This is the fastest way to decide without re-reading every section above.
- A copy trader who wants AvaSocial, DupliTrade or ZuluTrade on one account
- Trading FX options or hedging a spot position with AvaProtect
- A resident of Canada or Japan, where Pepperstone does not operate
- After the widest regulator net and CIPF cover up to CAD 1 million
- New and want the AvaAcademy education library while you learn
- An active or intraday trader where the $8 Razor cost matters
- A UK retail client who wants direct FCA cover with FSCS up to £85,000
- A chart-first trader who wants native TradingView order routing
- Starting with little capital and want a $0 minimum deposit
- Running EAs on cTrader with sub-100 ms execution
Bottom Line: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Pepperstone wins the head-to-head overall at 9.0 against 8.7. Its Razor account cost about $8 per lot round-turn against AvaTrade Standard’s $9, it holds direct FCA cover with FSCS up to £85,000, and its cTrader and TradingView stack scored 9.5 on platforms.
AvaTrade is the better broker for a specific trader: the copy trader, the options user, and anyone in Canada or Japan, where it is the only one of these two you can open. Its nine-licence regulatory net and CAD 1 million CIPF cover are genuine edges.
- Pick Pepperstone if you want the cheapest execution and native TradingView orders
- Pick AvaTrade if you want copy trading, FX options or the widest regulation
- Based in Canada or Japan? AvaTrade is your only pick of the two
- Running high volume on cTrader? Pepperstone Razor saves about $1 per lot
Best for copy trading & options
Best for copy traders and options users wanting the widest regulator safety net.
- Nine regulators including CIRO Canada with CIPF up to CAD 1 million
- AvaOptions vanilla FX plus AvaSocial, DupliTrade and ZuluTrade
- $100 minimum, EUR/USD 0.9 pip, zero commission
Visit AvaTrade
Top pick overall
Best for active traders chasing the cheapest Razor cost and TradingView orders.
- Razor EUR/USD about $8 per lot, $0 minimum deposit
- FCA 684312 with FSCS cover up to £85,000
- cTrader and native TradingView routing, 90 ms fills
Visit Pepperstone
For the full per-account detail, read our AvaTrade review and our Pepperstone review. Both were tested against the same testing methodology, and you can check is AvaTrade legit and is Pepperstone safe for the entity-level detail.
CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money. Affiliate disclosure: how we earn. Reviewed by Laura West, last updated 2026-08-19.
Scorecard: AvaTrade vs Pepperstone
Star ratings out of 5, converted from our tested 10-point scores for each broker.
| Dimension | AvaTrade | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Cost & Fees | 8.4 | 9.2 |
| Safety | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Platforms | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Withdrawals | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Support | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Education | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Instruments | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Mobile | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| Overall | 8.7 | 9.0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, AvaTrade or Pepperstone?
Both are safe, and the scores are close: Pepperstone edges the safety mark at 9.4 against AvaTrade at 9.2. Pepperstone's strength is direct FCA cover (licence 684312) with FSCS up to £85,000 for UK retail, plus ASIC, CySEC, DFSA and BaFin. AvaTrade answers with breadth, nine licences against six, including a Canadian CIRO entity carrying CIPF cover up to CAD 1 million per client, far above the £85,000 or €20,000 caps. The catch for both: most non-onshore clients route to an offshore entity (AvaTrade FSC BVI, Pepperstone SCB Bahamas) with no compensation scheme. Check which entity holds your account before you fund it, because that decides your real protection level.
Who has tighter spreads, AvaTrade or Pepperstone?
Pepperstone wins on raw cost. Its Razor account averaged 0.1 pip on EUR/USD plus a $7 round-turn commission, roughly $8 per lot all in, across my 14-day test. AvaTrade runs a single Standard tier at 0.9 pip with zero commission, which works out near $9 per lot round-turn, so about $1 more. AvaTrade has no Raw or ECN account to close that gap, so for a scalper running 30-plus lots a week Pepperstone Razor is measurably cheaper. For a low-volume discretionary trader under 5 lots a week the difference is small and AvaTrade's flat pricing is simpler to project. If cost per trade is your deciding factor, Pepperstone Razor is the pick.
Does Pepperstone accept Canada or Japan clients?
No. Pepperstone does not operate in Canada, Japan, the United States, Israel, New Zealand or Belgium. If you live in Canada or Japan, AvaTrade is the only one of these two brokers you can open. AvaTrade runs a Canadian entity through Friedberg Direct under CIRO, with CIPF cover up to CAD 1 million per eligible client, and a separate Ava Trade Japan KK entity under JP FSA registration 1662 with local investor protection. Both are genuine onshore licences rather than offshore routing. For Canadian and Japanese residents this is not a close call: AvaTrade is the answer, and the local compensation cover is a real reason to prefer it over any offshore alternative.
Can I open accounts at both AvaTrade and Pepperstone?
Yes. There is no restriction on holding live accounts at both brokers at once, and many active traders do exactly that. A common split I have seen work well: keep a Pepperstone Razor account for active EUR/USD and index trading where the $8 cost and cTrader depth matter, and run an AvaTrade account for copy trading through AvaSocial or for hedging a spot position with an AvaOptions put. Each broker runs its own KYC, so you verify identity documents twice. Keep both sets of documents current, because a stale proof-of-residence over 90 days old will pause a withdrawal on either side under the same EU AML rules.
Which is better for beginners, AvaTrade or Pepperstone?
It depends on what you want to learn. AvaTrade has the stronger education layer, scoring 9.0 with the AvaAcademy library, a 24-week trading school and a copy-trading route that lets a new trader follow a vetted signal provider while learning. Pepperstone opens at a $0 minimum deposit against AvaTrade's $100, which is friendlier if you want to start tiny, and its Standard account is commission-free at about 1.0 pip. For a beginner who wants structured teaching and copy trading, AvaTrade fits better. For a beginner who wants the lowest entry cost and plans to trade a simple Standard account, Pepperstone's $0 start and cleaner pricing are the edge.
Which has faster withdrawals, AvaTrade or Pepperstone?
Pepperstone is a little faster on e-wallets. Across 6 test cycles its Skrill and Neteller payouts settled in 2 to 6 hours at zero fee, and its SEPA EUR cleared in 1 business day. AvaTrade's Skrill and Neteller withdrawals settled in 4 to 8 hours across 5 cycles, with SEPA EUR in 1 to 2 business days. Both are quick by industry standards and neither charged a broker fee on e-wallets. One difference in funding: Pepperstone offers crypto withdrawals (BTC, ETH, USDT TRC-20) on its Bahamas entity, clearing broker-side inside 90 minutes, while AvaTrade runs no crypto rails at any entity. For payout speed and crypto options, Pepperstone has the slight edge.
Which offers copy trading, AvaTrade or Pepperstone?
AvaTrade, decisively. It builds in three separate copy-trading networks: AvaSocial (native inside MT5 with 200-plus signal providers and a 20% profit-share fee), DupliTrade (an institutional-tier signal service with curated track records), and ZuluTrade (a broad third-party network). You can run all three from one account. Pepperstone has no proprietary copy-trading or social-trading product on any tier, though its free Capitalise.ai layer lets non-coders automate rule-based strategies in plain English. So if copy trading or mirroring a signal provider is central to how you want to trade, AvaTrade is the clear pick and Pepperstone is not really in the running on that feature.