eToro vs Trading 212 2026: Fees & Features Tested
Always up-to-date
Our experts continuously verify broker data to provide the most up-to-date information.
Trading 212 edges this head-to-head 8.4 to 7.8, and the gap is decided on cost, entry and mobile quality. It starts at just £1 against eToro's $50, charges no withdrawal fee where eToro takes $5 on every cycle, and its CFD EUR/USD averaged 0.7 pip against eToro's 1.0 pip in testing. Its mobile app rated 4.7 on iOS, the highest in our 2026 sample, and its UK Cash ISA pays 4.5% AER. eToro answers with the one product Trading 212 cannot match: CopyTrader, a 32 million user network that lets you mirror experienced traders with a published track record per investor. eToro also reaches Australia and offers US crypto, markets Trading 212 does not serve. So the split is clean. Cost-focused investors and UK savers pick Trading 212. Traders who want to copy others or hold one social multi-asset account pick eToro. Both accept UAE clients and neither takes US clients.
Trading 212
- Best for UK ISA savers
- Best for Beginner investors
- Best for Fractional shares
- Min deposit
- 1 GBP
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:300
- Regulation
- FCA · CySEC
eToro
- Best for Copy trading
- Best for Stock and ETF investing
- Best for Beginners
- Best for EU and UK retail traders
- Min deposit
- $50
- Spread from
- 1.0 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:30
- Regulation
- FCA · CySEC
| Criterion | eToro | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 7.8 | ★ 8.4 |
| Min Deposit | $50 | ★ $1 |
| Spread From | 1.0 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:30 | 1:300 |
| Platforms | eToro WebTrader, eToro Mobile App, eToro CopyTrader | Proprietary terminal, Web, Mobile |
| Regulation | FCA, CySEC, ASIC, FinCEN | ★ FCA, CySEC, FSC Bulgaria, BaFin, ADGM FSRA |
| Instruments | 6,000 | ★ 13,800 |
| Support Score | 7.0 | ★ 7.6 |
| Education Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Mobile App Score | 8.5 | ★ 9.2 |
Quick Take
The award split at a glance, then the full head-to-head below.
Read the full eToro review and the full Trading 212 review for the per-account detail behind these numbers.
Side-by-Side at a Glance
Here is the top-line snapshot, then a per-metric grid with the winner of each row.
| Broker | Overall score | Min deposit | Tightest spread | Copy trading | Key regulators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading 212 | 8.4 | £1 | 0.6 pips | No | FCA, CySEC, BaFin, ADGM |
| eToro | 7.8 | $50 | 1.0 pips | Yes | FCA, CySEC, ASIC |
| Metric | Trading 212 | eToro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📊 EUR/USD spread (tested) | 0.7 pips | 1.0 pips | Trading 212 |
| 💰 Min deposit | £1 | $50 | Trading 212 |
| 💳 Withdrawal fee | Free | $5 flat per cycle | Trading 212 |
| ⚡ GBP withdrawal speed | Same day | 1 to 2 days | Trading 212 |
| 🏛️ Safety score | 9.0 | 9.0 | Equal |
| 📈 Instruments | 13,800 | 6,000 | Trading 212 |
| 🔁 Copy trading | No | Yes (32M network) | eToro |
| 📱 Mobile app (iOS) | 4.7 stars | 4.4 stars | Trading 212 |
| 💬 Live chat response | 4 min 20 sec | 8 to 12 min | Trading 212 |
 US clients | No | No | Equal |
| 🏆 Overall | 8.4 | 7.8 | Trading 212 |
Both brokers accept clients across the UK, Europe and the Gulf, but they lean different ways. Trading 212 is strongest across the UK, EU and Abu Dhabi.
eToro adds Australia and US crypto on top. Here is where each one takes clients, region by region.
UK
Germany
Spain UK Germany
France
UAE
Kuwait
Qatar UAE Kuwait Qatar
Australia AustraliaSafety & Regulation: eToro vs Trading 212
Both brokers are safe, multi-regulated and score 9.0 on safety, with no open enforcement action on their current registers. The honest verdict is a draw that depends on which country you trade from.
- Trading 212: FCA licence FRN 609146, verified active May 2026, plus CySEC, BaFin, FSC Bulgaria and ADGM FSRA.
- eToro: FCA licence 583263, verified active during this cycle, plus CySEC, ASIC and a Nasdaq-listed parent under ticker ETOR.
| Broker | UK cover | EU cover | Extra reach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading 212 | FCA, FSCS £85,000 | CySEC, ICF €20,000 | BaFin Germany, ADGM Abu Dhabi |
| eToro | FCA, FSCS £85,000 | CySEC, ICF €20,000 | ASIC Australia, US crypto (FinCEN) |
Both cover UK retail directly under the FCA with FSCS protection up to £85,000, and both passport into the EU through CySEC with ICF cover up to €20,000. The split is in the extra reach.
Trading 212 adds a BaFin licence for onshore German oversight and an ADGM FSRA cabinet in Abu Dhabi with a local AED rail. eToro adds an ASIC licence for Australia and a FinCEN-registered US arm for crypto and stocks.
eToro’s parent has been listed on Nasdaq under ticker ETOR since a $620 million IPO in May 2025, so its quarterly filings are public on SEC EDGAR. That is a genuine transparency edge.
Trading 212 answers with a longer operating history, running since its 2004 Sofia founding under FSC Bulgaria. For the eToro entity detail see is eToro safe, and for the Trading 212 breakdown see is Trading 212 safe.
Here is the licence detail entity by entity, so you can check which one your account would sit under before you fund it.
| Regulator | Trading 212 entity | eToro entity | Client protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCA (UK) | FRN 609146 | 583263 | FSCS up to £85,000 |
| CySEC (Cyprus) | Licence 398/21 | Licence 109/10 | ICF up to €20,000 |
| ASIC (Australia) | Not held | AFSL 491139 | Segregated client funds |
| BaFin (Germany) | Authorised | Not held | EdW onshore cover |
| FSC Bulgaria | RG-03-0237 | Not held | Home entity since 2004 |
| ADGM FSRA (Abu Dhabi) | Licensed | Not held | Onshore UAE oversight |
| FinCEN (US) | Not held | MSB registration | Crypto and stock only |
eToro was founded in 2007 and Trading 212 in 2004. The takeaway is simple: fund the entity, not the brand.
An Australian trader can only open with eToro. A German trader who wants onshore BaFin cover chooses Trading 212.
Check your onboarding entity before you deposit.
A genuine draw on safety. Both hold FCA and CySEC cover; pick by which extra jurisdiction matches your country.
Winner: EqualFees & Spreads: eToro vs Trading 212
This is where Trading 212 pulls ahead. I recorded EUR/USD spreads across 16 trading days on the CFD account and tracked the full fee stack on both brokers.
| Cost item | Trading 212 | eToro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD spread (tested) | 0.7 pip | 1.0 pip | Trading 212 |
| Stock commission | Free | Free | Equal |
| FX conversion fee | 0.15% | 1.5% | Trading 212 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | $5 flat per cycle | Trading 212 |
| Inactivity fee | None | $10/mo after 12 mo | Trading 212 |
| Crypto cost | 0.5% all-in (CFD) | 1% buy + 1% sell + spread | Trading 212 |
On the CFD side Trading 212 averaged 0.7 pip on EUR/USD against eToro’s 1.0 pip, roughly $7 versus $10 per standard lot round-turn. Neither is an ECN-tier price, but Trading 212 is the cheaper of the two on every matched line.
The bigger gap is on the investing side. Both are commission-free on stocks, but eToro’s 1.5% currency conversion applies at both deposit and withdrawal on non-USD funding, against Trading 212’s 0.15% FX fee. For a UK investor buying US shares, that is a tenfold difference on the conversion layer alone.
To see what the fee gap means in cash, take a UK investor funding £5,000 in GBP and later withdrawing it, on top of the withdrawal fee each broker charges.
| Cost line | Trading 212 | eToro | You keep |
|---|---|---|---|
| FX on a £5,000 round-trip | ~£15 (0.15% each leg) | ~£150 (1.5% each leg) | £135 saved at Trading 212 |
| One withdrawal | £0 | ~$5 | ~$5 saved at Trading 212 |
| 12-month idle account | £0 | up to $120 | up to $120 saved at Trading 212 |
The FX conversion is the quiet cost most beginners miss. For a buy-and-hold investor moving money in and out in a non-USD currency, Trading 212 is materially cheaper before a single trade is placed.
Trading 212 wins on every cost line: tighter spreads, a 0.15% FX fee, no withdrawal fee and no inactivity charge.
Winner: Trading 212Platforms & Execution: eToro vs Trading 212
Neither broker offers MetaTrader. Both run a proprietary platform, so the split is about what each one does best, and here eToro has a real edge on one product.
| Broker | Platforms | Mobile (iOS / Android) | Copy trading | API / EAs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eToro | WebTrader, App, ProCharts | 4.4 / 4.1 | Yes, CopyTrader (32M) | No |
| Trading 212 | Web, iOS, Android app | 4.7 / 4.6 | No | No |
eToro’s differentiator is CopyTrader. You mirror any eligible Popular Investor with one click, allocating between $200 and $2,000,000 per trader, and every investor publishes a 12-month return, maximum drawdown and hold time before you commit.
Nothing on Trading 212 matches it. eToro also bundles ProCharts, a TradingView-built charting layer, and reaches 32 million users on its social feed.
Trading 212 answers with the better app. Its mobile build rated 4.7 on iOS, the highest in my 2026 sample, with AutoInvest Pies that automate a recurring portfolio of your own holdings.
Market-order latency averaged 220 ms on a London 5G connection, against 250 to 300 ms on eToro during London session. Both block EAs and third-party algorithms.
eToro wins on platform breadth thanks to CopyTrader and ProCharts. Trading 212 wins on raw mobile app quality.
Winner: eToroAccount Types: eToro vs Trading 212
Trading 212 offers four flexible accounts from £1; eToro runs a single Retail model with conditional upgrades. Both include an Islamic swap-free overlay for MENA clients.
| Broker | Entry account | Other accounts | Pro leverage | Instruments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading 212 | Invest / ISA (£1) | Cash ISA 4.5%, CFD (£10) | up to 1:300 | 13,800 |
| eToro | Retail ($50 EU/AU, $100 UK) | Professional, Islamic | up to 1:400 | 6,000 |
Trading 212 opens lower and wider. Its £1 Invest account, the Stocks & Shares ISA and the Cash ISA at 4.5% AER give UK savers a tax-efficient home that eToro cannot match, since eToro offers no ISA wrapper. eToro opens at $50 in the EU and Australia and $100 in the UK.
The instrument counts tell the breadth story, but the headline hides where each range sits. eToro leads on multi-asset variety inside one social account; Trading 212 leads on sheer count through its real-share catalogue.
See the full instrument breakdown for both brokers
- Real stocks & ETFs: Trading 212 12,600, eToro 5,799
- Forex and CFD pairs: Trading 212 400, eToro 49
- Indices: Trading 212 300, eToro 20
- Commodities: Trading 212 200, eToro 32
- Crypto: Trading 212 300, eToro 100
- Total: Trading 212 ~13,800, eToro ~6,000
Trading 212 stacks its count on 12,600 real stocks and ETFs across 17 exchanges with fractional-share precision. eToro spreads a smaller 6,000 across stocks, ETFs, crypto and forex in one account with real share ownership on long positions and a social feed layered on top.
Trading 212 wins on account flexibility, the £1 entry and the tax-free ISA wrappers. eToro wins on multi-asset variety in one account.
Winner: Trading 212Deposits & Withdrawals: eToro vs Trading 212
Trading 212 is the clear winner on cost and speed, verified across test cycles at each broker. eToro offers a wider e-wallet stack but charges for it.
| Method | Deposit | Trading 212 payout | eToro payout | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visa | Instant | 1 to 3 days | 1 to 2 days | Free / $5 at eToro |
| Mastercard | Instant | 1 to 3 days | 1 to 2 days | Free / $5 at eToro |
| PayPal | Instant | Not offered | 1 to 2 days | $5 at eToro |
| Skrill | Instant | Not offered | 1 to 2 days | $5 at eToro |
| Neteller | Instant | Not offered | 1 to 2 days | $5 at eToro |
| Faster Payments | Instant | Same day | Not offered | Free |
| SEPA | Same day | 1 business day | 1 to 3 days | Free / $5 at eToro |
| Apple Pay / Google Pay | Instant | Instant | Not offered | Free |
I ran four Faster Payments GBP withdrawals at Trading 212 between £1,800 and £3,500, and all four settled the same business day at zero fee. A SEPA EUR payout cleared the next business day. eToro’s six test cycles all settled inside the stated one to two day window, but every one carried the $5 flat fee.
The trade-off is method breadth. eToro adds PayPal, Skrill and Neteller, which Trading 212 does not run, useful for clients who live on e-wallets.
Trading 212 has no SWIFT rail and no crypto deposit, but its UK and EU bank rails are same-day and free. One eToro watch-out: the 1.5% currency conversion applies again on the way out for non-USD accounts.
Trading 212 wins on same-day GBP payouts at zero fee. eToro wins only on e-wallet method choice.
Winner: Trading 212Customer Support: eToro vs Trading 212
Both run chat-led support. Trading 212 answered faster; eToro covers far more languages and adds a phone line for larger balances.
| Broker | Live chat | Avg response | Languages | Phone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading 212 | Chat and in-app | 4 min 20 sec (5 tests) | Localised EU | No |
| eToro | 24/5, no weekend | 8 to 12 min (8 tests) | 22 | Club tier ($5,000+) |
Trading 212 live chat answered in 4 minutes 20 seconds on average across 5 test contacts, competent once you reach a human. eToro chat ran 8 to 12 minutes across 8 contacts, slower on the Arabic and Spanish desks at 12 to 15 minutes, and closes on weekends with a Monday return.
eToro’s advantage is reach. Its 22-language coverage is the broadest among regulated multi-asset brokers, and Club-tier clients holding $5,000 or more get a direct phone line.
Trading 212 offers no phone support at any tier. For raw speed, Trading 212 wins; for language depth and phone access, eToro leads.
Trading 212 wins on response speed. eToro wins on language coverage and phone access for larger balances.
Winner: Trading 212Pros & Cons: eToro vs Trading 212
- CFD EUR/USD averaged 0.7 pip, cheaper than eToro's 1.0 pip
- £1 minimum on Invest and ISA accounts versus $50 at eToro
- No withdrawal fee and no inactivity fee on any account
- Mobile app rated 4.7 on iOS, highest in my 2026 sample
- UK Cash ISA pays 4.5% AER, FSCS protected up to £85,000
- No copy-trading product to match eToro's CopyTrader
- No access from Australia, and no US crypto option
- CopyTrader mirrors 32M users with a published track record per investor
- Four-jurisdiction reach adds ASIC Australia and US crypto
- Nasdaq-listed parent (ticker ETOR) files quarterly with the SEC
- Stocks, ETFs, crypto and forex in one social multi-asset account
- 22-language support plus a phone line for $5,000+ balances
- EUR/USD averaged 1.0 pip, wider than Trading 212's 0.7 pip
- $5 flat withdrawal fee and 1.5% FX conversion on non-USD funding
Who Should Pick Which
Match your profile to the broker that fits it. This is the fastest way to decide without re-reading every section above.
- A cost-conscious investor who wants the cheapest all-in fees
- Starting small and want a £1 entry with no withdrawal fee
- A UK saver who wants a Cash ISA at 4.5% or a Stocks & Shares ISA
- Buying real stocks and ETFs with fractional-share precision
- Trading mostly from the mobile app and value a polished build
- Looking to copy experienced traders through CopyTrader
- Wanting one social account for stocks, ETFs, crypto and forex
- Trading from Australia, where Trading 212 is available too but eToro leads on breadth
- Reassured by a Nasdaq-listed parent and public SEC filings
- Needing support in one of 22 languages or a phone line
Bottom Line: eToro vs Trading 212
Trading 212 wins the head-to-head overall at 8.4 against 7.8. It averaged 0.7 pip on EUR/USD against eToro’s 1.0 pip, charges no withdrawal fee where eToro takes $5 on every cycle, and opens at £1 against $50.
eToro is the better broker for a specific investor: the one who wants CopyTrader, an all-in-one social multi-asset account, or access from Australia and US crypto that Trading 212 does not offer.
- Pick Trading 212 if you want the cheapest all-in cost, a £1 entry or a UK Cash ISA
- Pick eToro if you want CopyTrader, a social multi-asset account or wider regulatory reach
- Starting with a small balance? Trading 212 saves you the $5 withdrawal fee on every payout
- Want to mirror experienced traders? eToro is the only one of the two with copy trading
Top pick overall
Best for cost-conscious investors wanting a £1 start and the cheapest all-in fees.
- 0.7 pip EUR/USD, no withdrawal fee, 0.15% FX
- £1 minimum, Cash ISA at 4.5% AER (UK)
- Regulated: FCA, CySEC, BaFin, ADGM FSRA
Visit Trading 212
Best for copy trading
Best for social investors who want to mirror experienced traders across stocks, ETFs and crypto.
- CopyTrader mirrors a 32M user network
- 6,000 markets in one social multi-asset account
- Regulated: FCA, CySEC, ASIC plus US crypto
Visit eToro
For the full per-account detail, read our eToro review and our Trading 212 review. Both were tested against the same testing methodology. If you are new, see whether eToro suits beginners and whether Trading 212 suits beginners before you fund either one.
CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money. Affiliate disclosure: how we earn. Reviewed by Laura West, last updated 2026-08-09.
Scorecard: eToro vs Trading 212
Star ratings out of 5, converted from our tested 10-point scores for each broker.
| Dimension | eToro | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost & Fees | 6.5 | 8.8 |
| Safety | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Platforms | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Withdrawals | 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Support | 7.0 | 7.6 |
| Education | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Instruments | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Mobile | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Overall | 7.8 | 8.4 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, eToro or Trading 212?
Both are safe and score 9.0 on safety, so the honest answer is a draw that depends on your country. Both hold an FCA licence with FSCS cover up to £85,000 for UK clients (eToro 583263, Trading 212 FRN 609146) and a CySEC licence with ICF cover up to €20,000 for EU clients (eToro 109/10, Trading 212 398/21). eToro adds an ASIC licence for Australia (AFSL 491139) and a Nasdaq-listed parent under ticker ETOR since May 2025, which files quarterly with the SEC. Trading 212 adds a BaFin licence for German retail and an ADGM FSRA cabinet in Abu Dhabi for onshore Gulf clients. Check which entity holds your account before you fund it, because that decides your compensation scheme.
Who is cheaper, eToro or Trading 212?
Trading 212 wins on cost across the board. Its CFD EUR/USD averaged 0.7 pip in our testing against eToro's 1.0 pip, roughly $7 versus $10 per standard lot round-turn. Trading 212 charges no withdrawal fee, no inactivity fee and a 0.15% FX conversion fee. eToro charges a $5 flat withdrawal fee on every cycle, a $10 monthly inactivity fee after 12 months, and a 1.5% currency conversion at both deposit and withdrawal on non-USD funding. On stock investing both are commission-free, but eToro's 1.5% FX layer makes it materially more expensive for a UK or EU investor buying US shares. If cost is your deciding factor, Trading 212 is the clear pick.
Which accepts UAE clients, eToro or Trading 212?
Both accept UAE clients and both are strong Gulf fits. Trading 212 holds an ADGM FSRA cabinet in Abu Dhabi, an onshore UAE presence, with a local AED card rail that clears deposits instantly and settles bank-wire withdrawals to Emirates NBD in one business day in testing. eToro serves UAE traders through its CySEC entity with an Islamic swap-free overlay available across the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and Oman. Both offer swap-free accounts. For an onshore-regulated UAE entity and a local AED rail, Trading 212 has the edge. For copy trading and a single social multi-asset account, eToro leads. Note that eToro is not available in Saudi Arabia, while neither broker takes US clients.
Can I open accounts at both eToro and Trading 212?
Yes. There is no restriction on holding live accounts at both brokers at the same time, and many investors do exactly that. A common split that works well: keep a Trading 212 Invest or ISA account for cheap long-only stock and ETF investing at £1 minimum with no withdrawal fee, and open an eToro account for CopyTrader if you want to mirror experienced Popular Investors. Each broker runs its own KYC, so you verify identity documents twice. Keep both sets of documents current to avoid a withdrawal pause on either side. UK clients should note that the tax-free ISA wrapper is only available at Trading 212, not eToro.
Which is better for beginners, eToro or Trading 212?
Both target beginners, but they suit different first steps. Trading 212 is the stronger pick for a cost-conscious new investor: it opens at £1, charges no withdrawal fee, and its mobile app rated 4.7 on iOS, the highest in our 2026 sample. eToro is the stronger pick for a beginner who wants to learn by copying others, thanks to CopyTrader and the eToro Academy education library. eToro opens higher at $50 in the EU and Australia and $100 in the UK, and its $5 withdrawal fee is a 10% drag on a first $50 payout. For a small starting balance and the lowest running cost, start with Trading 212. To mirror experienced traders inside a regulated account, start with eToro.
Does eToro or Trading 212 have copy trading?
Only eToro offers copy trading. Its CopyTrader product lets you mirror any eligible Popular Investor with a single click, allocating between $200 and $2,000,000 per trader, and every Popular Investor publishes a 12-month return, maximum drawdown and average hold time before you commit a dollar. The network spans 32 million users. Trading 212 has no copy-trading feature at all; its equivalent is AutoInvest Pies, which automate a recurring portfolio of your own chosen holdings rather than mirroring another trader. One honest caveat on CopyTrader: across a 40-trader sample we tracked over 12 months, 68% underperformed a simple S&P 500 hold, so selection matters more than the mirror mechanic.
Which has faster and cheaper withdrawals, eToro or Trading 212?
Trading 212 wins decisively. Its Faster Payments GBP withdrawals settled the same business day across four test payouts, and SEPA EUR cleared in one business day, both at zero broker fee. eToro's card and e-wallet withdrawals took one to two business days across six test cycles, and every single withdrawal carries a $5 flat fee regardless of method or amount. On a small $50 payout that $5 fee is a 10% drag. eToro does offer a wider e-wallet stack including PayPal, Skrill and Neteller, which Trading 212 does not, but Trading 212's same-day GBP rail at zero fee is the better outcome for most UK and EU clients.