Exness vs FxPro 2026: Fees & Safety Tested
Exness edges this head-to-head 9.3 to 8.7, and the gap is decided on cost, payout speed and entry price. Across my 14-day test the Exness Pro account averaged 0.13 pips on EUR/USD, about $1.30 per lot round-turn, against 0.6 pips on FxPro's cheapest commission-free Standard tier. Skrill withdrawals cleared in 2 to 4 minutes at Exness versus 2 to 5 hours at FxPro. Exness also opens at $10 against FxPro's $100 floor. FxPro answers with the stronger safety score at 9.2, a direct FCA licence covering UK retail, an onshore DFSA licence in Dubai, four trading platforms including cTrader and a 2,100-instrument catalogue. So the split is clean. Active traders who want the tightest spreads and near-instant e-wallet payouts pick Exness. Traders who want tier-1 FCA retail cover, cTrader depth and broad instrument choice pick FxPro. Both accept UAE clients and neither takes US residents.
- Best for Instant withdrawals
- Best for MENA traders
- Best for SEA traders
- Best for High leverage
- Min deposit
- $10
- Spread from
- 0.0 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:Unlimited
- Regulation
- CySEC · FCA
- Best for FCA regulation
- Best for cTrader Raw
- Best for Multi-platform
- Min deposit
- $100
- Spread from
- 0.0 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Regulation
- FCA · CySEC
| Criterion | Exness | FxPro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | ★ 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Min Deposit | ★ $10 | $100 |
| Spread From | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:Unlimited | 1:500 |
| Platforms | ★ MT4, MT5, Exness Terminal, Exness App, Mobile, Web | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro Trading Platform |
| Regulation | CySEC, FCA, FSA Seychelles, FSCA | ★ FCA, CySEC, DFSA, FSCA, SCB |
| Instruments | 230 | ★ 2,100 |
| Support Score | ★ 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Education Score | ★ 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Mobile App Score | ★ 9.0 | 8.6 |
Quick Take
The award split at a glance, then the full head-to-head below.
Read the full Exness review and the full FxPro review for the per-account detail behind these numbers.
Side-by-Side at a Glance
Here is the top-line snapshot, then a per-metric grid with the winner of each row.
| Broker | Overall score | Min deposit | Tightest spread | Max leverage | Key regulators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | 9.3 | $10 | 0.13 pips | 1:Unlimited | CySEC, FCA, FSCA |
| FxPro | 8.7 | $100 | 0.1 pips | 1:500 | FCA, CySEC, DFSA |
| Metric | Exness | FxPro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📊 EUR/USD spread (cheapest commission-free tier) | 0.13 pips | 0.6 pips | Exness |
| 💰 Min deposit | $10 | $100 | Exness |
| ⚡ Withdrawal speed (Skrill) | 2 to 4 min | 2 to 5 hr | Exness |
| 🏛️ Safety score | 9.0 | 9.2 | FxPro |
| 📈 Instruments | 230 | 2,100 | FxPro |
| 📱 Platforms | MT4, MT5, Terminal | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro | FxPro |
| 💬 Live chat response | 1 min 40 sec | 2 min 10 sec | Exness |
| 📲 Mobile app (iOS) | 4.7 stars | 4.5 stars | Exness |
| No | No | Equal | |
| 🏆 Overall | 9.3 | 8.7 | Exness |
Both brokers accept clients across MENA, Southeast Asia, Africa and Europe, but they lean different ways. Exness is strongest across the Gulf, Southeast Asia and Africa.
FxPro adds direct European retail access on top. Here is where each one takes clients, region by region.
Safety & Regulation: Exness vs FxPro
Both brokers are safe and multi-regulated with no public enforcement actions on file. FxPro scores 9.2 on safety against Exness at 9.0, mostly because it holds a direct FCA licence for UK retail clients.
- Exness: FCA licence 730729, professional clients only, plus CySEC 178/12 and FSCA.
- FxPro: FCA licence 509956, UK retail, plus CySEC 078/07, DFSA and FSCA.
| Broker | Onshore entities | UK cover | Offshore default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | CySEC, FCA (pro), FSCA (South Africa) | FSCS £85,000 (pro clients only) | Seychelles FSA (no scheme) |
| FxPro | FCA (retail), CySEC, DFSA (Dubai), FSCA | FSCS £85,000 (retail) | SCB Belize/Bahamas (no scheme) |
The meaningful split is the UK arm. Exness UK serves professional clients only, so UK retail traders route offshore.
FxPro’s FCA entity covers UK retail directly with FSCS up to £85,000. FxPro also holds a DFSA licence inside the Dubai DIFC, an onshore UAE presence rather than a passported offshore licence.
Exness answers with an FSCA licence in South Africa plus audited monthly volume figures. Deloitte’s January 2026 report cited $4.6 trillion turnover, unusual transparency in this sector. For the full licence breakdown see FxPro’s regulation, and check is Exness safe for the Exness entity detail.
Here is the licence detail entity by entity, so you can check which one your account would sit under before you fund it.
| Regulator | Exness entity | FxPro entity | Client protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| CySEC (Cyprus) | Licence 178/12 | Licence 078/07 | ICF up to €20,000 |
| FCA (UK) | Licence 730729, pro clients | Licence 509956, retail | FSCS up to £85,000 |
| DFSA (Dubai DIFC) | Not held | F003333 | Onshore UAE oversight |
| FSCA (South Africa) | FSP 51024 | FSP 45052 | Local conduct oversight |
| FSA (Seychelles) | SD025 | Not held | No compensation scheme |
| SCB (Bahamas) | Not held | SIA-F184 | No compensation scheme |
| CBCS (Curaçao) | 0003LSI | Not held | Local registration |
| Offshore default | FSA Seychelles | SCB Bahamas | No compensation scheme |
Exness was founded in 2008 and FxPro in 2006. The takeaway is simple: fund the entity, not the brand.
A UK retail trader is covered at FxPro and routed offshore at Exness. A UAE onshore client gets DFSA cover at FxPro.
Check your onboarding entity before you deposit.
FxPro wins on safety for UK and UAE retail clients thanks to its direct retail FCA cover and onshore DFSA licence.
Winner: FxProFees & Spreads: Exness vs FxPro
This is where Exness pulls ahead. I recorded EUR/USD spreads at 5-minute intervals across 14 trading days on each account tier.
| Broker | Cheapest commission-free tier | Avg EUR/USD spread | Effective cost per lot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | Pro ($200) | 0.13 pips | ~$1.30 round-turn |
| FxPro | Standard ($100) | 0.6 pips | ~$6.00 round-turn |
| Exness | Standard ($10) | 1.0 pips | ~$10.00 round-turn |
| FxPro | Raw+ ($100), 0.1 pip + $7 comm | 0.1 pips raw | ~$8.00 round-turn |
Exness Pro at roughly $1.30 per lot is about five times cheaper than FxPro Standard at $6. FxPro’s Raw+ account narrows the raw spread to 0.1 pips, but the $7 round-turn commission lands near $8 effective, still above Exness Pro.
Credit where it is due: FxPro Standard at 0.6 pips is one of the tighter no-commission tiers at this oversight grade, and it beats the Exness $10 Standard account at 1.0 pip. Neither charges a short-term inactivity fee, though FxPro applies $10 monthly after 6 months dormant.
To see what the spread gap means in cash, take a trader running EUR/USD on the cheapest commission-free tier at each broker.
| Monthly volume | Exness Pro (0.13 pips) | FxPro Standard (0.6 pips) | You keep |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 lots | ~$13 | ~$60 | $47 saved at Exness |
| 50 lots | ~$65 | ~$300 | $235 saved at Exness |
| 100 lots | ~$130 | ~$600 | $470 saved at Exness |
At 50 lots a month the gap is about $235, or roughly $2,800 a year. It is small for a low-volume trader and large for a scalper or intraday trader.
Exness wins on raw trading cost at every matched tier. FxPro wins only on the tightest no-commission Standard spread.
Winner: ExnessPlatforms & Execution: Exness vs FxPro
Both run the MetaTrader stack with clean execution and no broker-side EA restrictions. The difference is the proprietary layer and the cTrader option.
| Broker | Platforms | Mobile (iOS / Android) | Tested execution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | MT4, MT5, Exness Terminal, Exness App | 4.7 / 4.5 | Sub-200 ms, 0 of 540 rejected |
| FxPro | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro Platform | 4.5 / 4.3 | 100 ms cTrader on London VPS |
FxPro is the only one of the two that offers cTrader, and its build adds Level II depth-of-market, iceberg orders and partial-fill stop-loss that MetaTrader hides. Its cTrader averaged 100 ms round-trip from a London VPS, ahead of the regulated broker average, though a touch behind IC Markets and Pepperstone.
Exness answers with the stronger mobile app, rated 4.7 stars and the highest in my 2026 forex sample, plus a lock-screen widget that closes positions without unlocking the phone. It also posted zero rejections across a 540-order test.
FxPro wins on platform breadth and cTrader depth. Exness wins on mobile polish and rejection-free fills.
Winner: FxProAccount Types: Exness vs FxPro
Exness opens lower and offers more tiers for active traders; FxPro starts higher but ships a tight Standard spread. Both include an Islamic swap-free overlay.
| Broker | Entry account | Cheapest cost tier | Islamic overlay | Instruments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | Standard ($10) | Pro ($200), 0.13 pips | Yes, no expiry | 230 |
| FxPro | Standard ($100) | Raw+ ($100), 0.1 pip + $7 | Yes, 24h to apply | 2,100 |
Exness starts at a $10 minimum against FxPro’s $100 floor, the friendlier live-trading entry for a smaller account. FxPro’s Raw+ at $100 is its sweet spot for cost-conscious active traders who want cTrader.
See the full account-tier breakdown for both brokers
- Exness Standard Cent ($10): first-time traders, positions in USD cents
- Exness Standard ($10): retail and swing trading, zero commission, 1.0 pip avg
- Exness Pro ($200): active intraday traders, 0.13 pip avg, zero commission
- Exness Raw Spread ($200): scalpers and EAs, 0.0 pip raw plus $3.5/side
- FxPro Standard ($100): first-time live trading, 0.6 pip avg, zero commission
- FxPro Raw+ ($100): scalpers and EA users, 0.0 to 0.1 pip raw plus $7 round-turn
- FxPro Elite ($30,000): high-volume traders, $5 to $7 round-turn on volume tiers
- FxPro Islamic ($100): swap-free overlay on any base account
The 230 versus 2,100 headline hides where the range sits. Exness is deep in forex and metals. FxPro stacks its count almost entirely on single-name stock CFDs.
| Asset class | Exness | FxPro |
|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 100 | 70 |
| Metals | 4 | 4 |
| Energy | 6 | 6 |
| Indices | 14 | 22 |
| Stock CFDs | 73 | 1,984 |
| Crypto CFDs | 33 | 10 |
| Softs / bonds | 0 | 4 |
| Total | ~230 | ~2,100 |
Exness actually lists more currency pairs and more crypto CFDs than FxPro despite the smaller headline. If you want single-name equities, FxPro’s near-2,000 stock CFDs are the reason to pick it.
Exness wins on entry price and the cheapest active-trader tier. FxPro wins on instrument range.
Winner: ExnessDeposits & Withdrawals: Exness vs FxPro
Exness is the clear winner on payout speed, verified across my test cycles at each broker.
| Broker | Skrill / Neteller | Bank rails | Test cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | 2 to 4 min | Local AED, VND, THB, IDR, ZAR same day | 12 cycles |
| FxPro | 2 to 5 hr | SEPA 1 business day | 11 cycles |
I ran 12 withdrawals at Exness; all settled without manual review, the slowest a $4,500 Skrill payout at 5 minutes. FxPro’s 11 cycles cleared Skrill in 2 to 5 hours and SEPA in 1 business day.
Here is the funding picture method by method, deposit and payout.
| Method | Deposit | Exness payout | FxPro payout | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skrill | Instant | 2 to 4 min | 2 to 5 hr | Free both |
| Neteller | Instant | 2 to 4 min | 2 to 5 hr | Free both |
| Visa | Instant | Same day | 3 to 5 days | Free both |
| Mastercard | Instant | Same day | 3 to 5 days | Free both |
| PayPal | Instant | Not offered | 24 hr | Free at FxPro |
| SEPA | Same day | Same day | 1 business day | Free both |
| SWIFT | 1 to 3 days | 1 to 2 days | 1 to 2 days | $10 under $250 at FxPro |
| Local bank (AED/VND/THB/IDR/ZAR) | ~30 min | Same day | Not offered | Free at Exness |
| USDT | Instant | 4 to 6 min | 25 min | Network fee only |
Exness adds same-day local bank rails across MENA and Southeast Asia that FxPro does not run. FxPro adds PayPal on its FCA and CySEC entities, which Exness does not. One FxPro watch-out: SWIFT wires under $250 carry a $10 flat fee, and crypto rails only run on the Bahamas and FSCA entities.
Exness wins decisively on withdrawal speed, with same-day local bank rails in MENA and Southeast Asia.
Winner: ExnessCustomer Support: Exness vs FxPro
Both run strong Arabic and multi-language desks. Exness answered faster and covers weekends.
| Broker | Live chat hours | Avg response | Languages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exness | 24/7 | 1 min 40 sec (8 tests) | 16 |
| FxPro | 24/5 | 2 min 10 sec (6 tests) | 9 |
Exness live chat runs around the clock and answered in 1 minute 40 seconds on average across 8 test contacts. FxPro’s chat is 24/5 and some language desks, such as Italian, run standard business hours only.
FxPro’s support is competent and its DFSA entity gives UAE clients a local escalation path. For raw speed and weekend cover, Exness wins.
Exness wins on response speed and 24/7 cover. FxPro holds its own on regional desks.
Winner: ExnessPros & Cons: Exness vs FxPro
- Pro EUR/USD averaged 0.13 pips, about $1.30 per lot round-turn
- $10 Standard entry against FxPro's $100 floor
- Skrill withdrawals settled in 2 to 4 minutes across 12 cycles
- Live chat answered in 1 min 40 sec across 8 tests, 24/7
- Local AED, VND, THB, IDR and ZAR bank rails settle same day
- Most non-EU clients route to the offshore Seychelles entity
- No cTrader and only 230 instruments versus 2,100 at FxPro
- FCA 509956 covers UK retail clients with FSCS up to £85,000
- DFSA F003333 gives an onshore UAE presence in the Dubai DIFC
- Four platforms including cTrader at 100 ms on a London VPS
- 2,100 instruments including nearly 2,000 single-name stock CFDs
- Standard tier holds 0.6 pips with zero commission
- Cheapest commission-free tier is 0.6 pips, above Exness Pro
- Skrill withdrawals took 2 to 5 hours and $100 entry floor
Who Should Pick Which
Match your trader profile to the broker that fits it. This is the fastest way to decide without re-reading every section above.
- An active or intraday trader where 0.13 pip cost matters
- Starting small and want a $10 live-trading entry
- Withdrawing often and want e-wallet payouts in minutes
- Trading from the Gulf, Southeast Asia or Africa with local bank rails
- Focused on forex, metals and crypto CFDs rather than single stocks
- A UK or UAE retail client who wants onshore FCA or DFSA cover
- Trading on cTrader with depth-of-market and advanced orders
- Running a broad range including nearly 2,000 stock CFDs
- An EU retail trader who wants direct access rather than pro-only
- Comfortable with slower payouts in exchange for oversight and breadth
Bottom Line: Exness vs FxPro
Exness wins the head-to-head overall at 9.3 against 8.7. It averaged 0.13 pips on EUR/USD Pro versus FxPro’s 0.6 pips, opens at $10 against $100, and its Skrill payouts settled in 2 to 4 minutes against FxPro’s 2 to 5 hours.
FxPro is the better broker for a specific trader: the one who wants direct FCA retail protection, cTrader depth and a broad instrument range and will accept slower payouts and a higher entry for it.
- Pick Exness if you want the tightest trading cost, a $10 start and the fastest e-wallet withdrawals
- Pick FxPro if you want direct FCA retail cover, cTrader and 2,100 instruments
- Brand new with a small balance? Start with Exness at $10
- Need UK retail FCA protection or cTrader depth? Go with FxPro
Top pick overall
Best for active traders chasing low spreads and instant withdrawals.
- Pro EUR/USD averaged 0.13 pips, zero commission
- Skrill withdrawals confirmed in 2 to 4 min
- Regulated: CySEC, FCA, FSCA
Visit Exness
Best for FCA cover and cTrader
Best for traders wanting tier-1 FCA oversight and a multi-platform stack.
- Direct FCA retail cover, FSCS up to £85,000
- Four platforms including cTrader, 2,100 instruments
- Regulated: FCA, CySEC, DFSA, FSCA, SCB
Visit FxPro
For the full per-account detail, read our Exness review and our FxPro review. Both were tested against the same testing methodology, and you can check is FxPro safe for the FxPro entity breakdown.
CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money. Affiliate disclosure: how we earn. Reviewed by Laura West, last updated 2026-08-11.
Scorecard: Exness vs FxPro
Star ratings out of 5, converted from our tested 10-point scores for each broker.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, Exness or FxPro?
FxPro edges the safety score at 9.2 against Exness at 9.0, mainly because it holds a direct FCA licence for UK retail clients. FxPro UK (FCA 509956) covers UK retail with FSCS up to £85,000, while Exness UK (FCA 730729) is professional-clients-only, so UK retail traders at Exness route offshore. FxPro also holds a DFSA licence (F003333) inside the Dubai DIFC, an onshore UAE presence. Both run offshore default entities with no compensation scheme: Exness Seychelles and FxPro Bahamas (SCB). The rule is the same at both brokers. Check which entity holds your account before you fund it, because that decides your real protection level.
Who has tighter spreads, Exness or FxPro?
Exness wins on raw cost. Its Pro account averaged 0.13 pips on EUR/USD across my 14-day test, roughly $1.30 per lot round-turn at zero commission. FxPro's cheapest commission-free tier is Standard at 0.6 pips, about $6 per lot round-turn. FxPro's Raw+ account narrows the raw spread to 0.1 pip but adds a $7 round-turn commission, landing near $8 effective, still above Exness Pro. FxPro Standard at 0.6 pips is genuinely one of the tighter no-commission tiers I have tested, so it beats the Exness $10 Standard account at 1.0 pip. If cost per trade is your deciding factor, Exness Pro is the clear pick.
Which accepts UAE clients, Exness or FxPro?
Both accept UAE clients, and both are strong regional fits. FxPro holds a DFSA licence (F003333) inside the Dubai International Financial Centre, an onshore UAE presence rather than a passported offshore licence. Exness serves UAE traders through its wider multi-jurisdiction structure with local AED bank rails that settle same business day, often inside 6 hours. Both offer Islamic swap-free accounts without expiry at Exness and applied within 24 hours at FxPro. For an onshore-regulated UAE entity, FxPro has the edge. For faster AED withdrawals and tighter Pro spreads, Exness leads. Neither accepts US, Canada or Japan residents.
Can I open accounts at both Exness and FxPro?
Yes. There is no restriction on holding live accounts at both brokers at the same time, and many active traders do exactly that. A common split I have seen work well: fund an Exness Pro account for active EUR/USD and metals trading where the 0.13 pip cost and 2 to 4 minute payouts matter, and keep an FxPro Raw+ account open on cTrader for depth-of-market reading, single-stock CFDs and the FCA retail cover. Each broker runs its own KYC, so you verify identity documents twice. Keep both sets of documents current to avoid a withdrawal pause on either side.
Which is better for beginners, Exness or FxPro?
Exness is the friendlier start on entry price. It opens at a $10 minimum on the Standard account against FxPro's $100 floor, and its mobile app rated 4.7 stars, the highest in my 2026 forex sample. That lower entry lets a new trader go live with meaningful cost control from day one. FxPro is a better fit for a beginner who specifically wants FCA retail protection or plans to grow into cTrader, but its $100 entry and commission-based Raw+ tier are aimed more at active traders. If you are brand new and want the lowest entry with a clean app, Exness fits better.
Which has faster withdrawals, Exness or FxPro?
Exness is significantly faster on e-wallets. Across 12 test cycles its Skrill and Neteller payouts settled in 2 to 4 minutes, with the slowest a $4,500 Skrill payout that took 5 minutes. FxPro's Skrill and Neteller withdrawals cleared in 2 to 5 hours across 5 cycles, and its SEPA bank wire took 1 business day. Exness also runs local AED, VND, THB, IDR and ZAR bank rails that settle same business day, which FxPro does not offer. FxPro does support USDT TRC-20 withdrawals that cleared in about 25 minutes on its Bahamas entity. For payout speed, Exness is the clear winner.
Which has more platforms and instruments, Exness or FxPro?
FxPro wins both. It runs four platforms in parallel: MT4, MT5, cTrader and its own FxPro Trading Platform, while Exness offers MT4, MT5 and the Exness Terminal but no cTrader. FxPro's cTrader build averaged 100 ms round-trip from a London VPS and adds Level II depth-of-market, iceberg and partial-fill orders that Exness does not match. On instruments FxPro lists about 2,100 against 230 at Exness, driven by roughly 1,900 single-name stock CFDs. If you want cTrader depth or a broad equity range, FxPro is the better all-in platform. If your focus is forex and metals with the tightest cost, Exness covers that well.