Pepperstone vs XM 2026: Fees, Safety & Platforms Tested
Always up-to-date
Our experts continuously verify broker data to provide the most up-to-date information.
XM edges this head-to-head 9.1 to 9.0, and the split comes down to who you are. XM scores higher on safety at 9.5, runs the deepest education programme in this peer set, opens at a $5 minimum with micro-lot sizing, and offers leverage up to 1:1000 on its offshore entity. Pepperstone answers with the cheaper active tier: a Razor account at 0.0 pip raw spreads plus a $7 round-turn, cTrader and native TradingView, free Capitalise.ai automation, and Skrill withdrawals in 3 to 8 hours against XM's 1 to 2 business days. Both hold a direct FCA licence with FSCS cover up to GBP 85,000, both run onshore Dubai DFSA entities, and neither accepts US, Canadian or Japanese residents. So the choice is clean. Beginners who value education, bonuses and high leverage pick XM. Cost-focused and active traders who want raw ECN pricing and the best platforms pick Pepperstone.
- Best for Beginners
- Best for Bonus seekers
- Best for Education
- Best for MT4 / MT5
- Min deposit
- $5
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:1000
- Regulation
- CySEC · ASIC
- Best for FCA regulation
- Best for ECN execution
- Best for TradingView orders
- Min deposit
- $0
- Spread from
- 0.0 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Regulation
- FCA · ASIC
| Criterion | Pepperstone | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.0 | ★ 9.1 |
| Min Deposit | ★ $0 | $5 |
| Spread From | 0.0 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:1000 |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | ★ MT4, MT5, XM App, WebTrader, Mobile, Web |
| Regulation | ★ FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, BaFin, SCB | CySEC, ASIC, FCA, DFSA |
| Instruments | 1,200 | ★ 1,400 |
| Support Score | ★ 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Education Score | 8.4 | ★ 9.5 |
| Mobile App Score | ★ 9.0 | 8.0 |
Quick Take
The award split at a glance, then the full head-to-head below.
Read the full Pepperstone review and the full XM review for the per-account detail behind these numbers.
Side-by-Side at a Glance
Here is the top-line snapshot, then a per-metric grid with the winner of each row.
| Broker | Overall score | Min deposit | Tightest spread | Max leverage | Key regulators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | 9.0 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA |
| XM Group | 9.1 | $5 | 0.6 pips | 1:1000 | CySEC, FCA, ASIC, DFSA |
| Metric | Pepperstone | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD spread (cheapest commission-free) | ~1.0 pip Standard | 0.6 pip Ultra Low | XM |
| EUR/USD on raw tier | 0.0 to 0.1 pip Razor | 0.0 to 0.1 pip Zero | Equal |
| Min deposit | $0 | $5 | Pepperstone |
| Withdrawal speed (Skrill) | 3 to 8 hr | 12 to 36 hr | Pepperstone |
| Safety score | 9.4 | 9.5 | XM |
| Instruments | ~1,200 | ~1,400 | XM |
| Live chat response | 1 min 30 sec | 2 to 3 min | Pepperstone |
| Education | Basic | Multi-language | XM |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | MT4, MT5 | Pepperstone |
| US clients | No | No | Equal |
| Overall | 9.0 | 9.1 | XM |
Both brokers accept clients across MENA, Europe, Southeast Asia and Africa. Here is where each one takes clients, region by region.
UAE
Saudi Arabia
Egypt UAE Egypt
Bahrain
UK
Germany
Cyprus UK Germany
Spain
Thailand
Indonesia
Malaysia Thailand Indonesia Malaysia
South Africa
Kenya South Africa
NigeriaSafety & Regulation: Pepperstone vs XM
Both brokers are safe and multi-regulated with no public enforcement actions on file. XM scores 9.5 on safety against Pepperstone at 9.4. The gap is narrow and comes down to entity breadth.
- Pepperstone: FCA licence 684312, ASIC AFSL 414530, CySEC 388/20, DFSA F004356, BaFin oversight in Germany, SCB in the Bahamas. Six regulated entities.
- XM: FCA licence 705428, CySEC 120/10, ASIC AFSL 443670, DFSA F003484 in the Dubai DIFC. Four entities.
| Broker | Onshore entities | UK cover | EU cover |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | FCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, BaFin (DE) | FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (retail) | ICF up to EUR 20,000 |
| XM Group | CySEC, FCA, ASIC, DFSA (Dubai) | FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (retail) | ICF up to EUR 20,000 |
Both hold a direct FCA licence covering UK retail clients with FSCS protection. Both run CySEC entities with ICF cover for EU retail clients. Both maintain onshore DFSA licences inside the Dubai DIFC.
The safety score gap of 9.5 to 9.4 reflects entity breadth rather than any meaningful difference in client-fund security. Both keep client funds in segregated bank accounts, apply negative balance protection, and carry no current enforcement action on file.
XM edges safety at 9.5 to 9.4. UK and EU retail clients get identical FSCS and ICF cover from both.
Winner: XM GroupFees & Spreads: Pepperstone vs XM
I recorded EUR/USD spreads across a 14-day testing window on each account tier.
| Broker | Account | Avg EUR/USD spread | Commission | Effective cost per lot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | Razor | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $7 round-turn ($3.50 per side) | ~$8 effective |
| XM Group | Zero | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $7 round-turn ($3.50 per side) | ~$8 effective |
| Pepperstone | Standard | ~1.0 pip | None | ~$10 |
| XM Group | Ultra Low | 0.6 pips | None | ~$6 |
| XM Group | Standard | 1.7 pips | None | ~$17 |
On the raw tier, Pepperstone Razor and XM Zero land at the same effective cost of roughly $8 per lot. On the commission-free tier, XM Ultra Low at 0.6 pips beats Pepperstone Standard at 1.0 pip once you cross the $50 minimum. Pepperstone wins on zero inactivity fee, which XM applies after a dormancy period.
To see what the commission-free spread gap means in cash at different volumes:
| Monthly volume | Pepperstone Standard (1.0 pip) | XM Ultra Low (0.6 pips) | You save at XM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 lots | ~$100 | ~$60 | $40 |
| 50 lots | ~$500 | ~$300 | $200 |
| 100 lots | ~$1,000 | ~$600 | $400 |
Pepperstone answers with a fees score of 9.2 against XM at 8.8, reflecting the no-inactivity-fee advantage and execution quality on the Razor tier.
XM Ultra Low at 0.6 pip beats Pepperstone Standard at 1.0 pip commission-free. Raw tier is a tie. Pepperstone wins on no inactivity fee.
Winner: XM Group (commission-free tier)Platforms & Execution: Pepperstone vs XM
Pepperstone runs a broader platform stack. XM covers the MetaTrader essentials.
| Broker | Platforms | Tested rejections |
|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Capitalise.ai | 0 of 500+ orders |
| XM Group | MT4, MT5, WebTrader, XM App | 0 of 412 orders |
Pepperstone is the stronger platform pick if cTrader matters. cTrader offers depth-of-market pricing on major pairs, native stop-limit orders, and direct strategy automation. Native TradingView routing lets traders set up charts and execute without switching terminals. Capitalise.ai is bundled free for plain-language automation.
XM covers the full MT4 and MT5 library with clean execution and no EA restrictions. For MetaTrader-only traders the two are closely matched. For anyone who wants cTrader or native TradingView, Pepperstone is the clear pick.
Pepperstone wins on platform depth. cTrader, native TradingView and free Capitalise.ai have no equivalent at XM.
Winner: PepperstoneAccount Types: Pepperstone vs XM
XM opens lower and offers more instrument breadth. Pepperstone offers the wider forex book and no-minimum entry on the Razor tier.
| Broker | Entry account | Raw-spread tier | Islamic overlay | Instruments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | Standard ($0) | Razor ($0) | Yes | ~1,200 |
| XM Group | Micro ($5) | Zero ($100) | Yes, no expiry | ~1,400 |
XM’s $5 Micro account with 0.01-lot sizing is the friendliest live-trading entry for a new trader. Pepperstone’s $0 Standard is the lower absolute entry but its spread at 1.0 pip is wider. Active traders focused on cost will target the Razor or Zero account at each broker.
See the full account-tier breakdown for both brokers
- Pepperstone Standard ($0): retail and swing trading, ~1.0 pip avg, zero commission
- Pepperstone Razor ($0): active intraday traders, 0.0 to 0.1 pip raw plus $7 round-turn
- XM Micro ($5): learning and testing, 0.01-lot sizing, 1.7 pip avg
- XM Standard ($5): beginners and bonus seekers, 1.7 pip avg, zero commission
- XM Ultra Low ($50): cost-conscious traders, 0.6 pip avg, zero commission
- XM Zero ($100): scalpers and EAs, 0.0 to 0.1 pip raw plus $7 round-turn
Pepperstone lists ~90 currency pairs against XM’s 57. XM’s higher headline instrument count of 1,400 comes largely from a deeper single-name stock CFD range.
| Asset class | Pepperstone | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | ~90 | ~57 |
| Metals | Available | Available |
| Indices | Available | ~50 |
| Stock CFDs | ~100 | ~1,300 |
| Crypto CFDs | Available | ~58 |
| Total | ~1,200 | ~1,400 |
XM wins on entry accessibility and breadth. Pepperstone wins on forex pair count and the no-minimum Razor account.
Winner: XM Group (accessibility)Deposits & Withdrawals: Pepperstone vs XM
Pepperstone is the clear winner on payout speed, verified across test cycles at each broker.
| Broker | Skrill / Neteller | SEPA | Inactivity fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | 3 to 8 hr | 1 business day | None |
| XM Group | 12 to 36 hr | 2 business days | After dormancy |
Pepperstone’s Skrill and Neteller payouts settled in 3 to 8 hours at zero broker fee. A test withdrawal at XM arrived in approximately 36 hours end to end. SEPA transfers settled in 1 business day at Pepperstone and 2 business days at XM.
| Method | Deposit | Pepperstone payout | XM payout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skrill | Instant | 3 to 8 hr | 12 to 36 hr |
| Neteller | Instant | 3 to 8 hr | 12 to 36 hr |
| Visa / Mastercard | Instant | 3 to 5 days | 3 to 5 days |
| SEPA | Same day | 1 business day | 2 business days |
| SWIFT | 1 to 3 days | 2 to 3 days | 2 to 5 days |
Pepperstone wins on withdrawal speed and no inactivity fee on any account.
Winner: PepperstoneCustomer Support: Pepperstone vs XM
Both run Arabic support desks and cover major trading time zones. Pepperstone answered faster.
| Broker | Live chat | Avg response | Languages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pepperstone | 24/7 | 1 min 30 sec (5 tests) | Multiple |
| XM Group | 24/5 | 2 to 3 min (5 tests) | 9 |
Pepperstone live chat answered in 1 minute 30 seconds on average across 5 test contacts, with 80 percent of queries resolved on the first interaction. XM’s live chat is 24/5 and averaged 2 to 3 minutes, with scripted responses noted on more complex queries.
XM’s advantage is depth of education-linked support, with live webinar Q&A sessions available regularly. For raw speed and weekend availability, Pepperstone leads.
Pepperstone wins on response speed and resolution rate. XM wins on education-linked support depth.
Winner: PepperstonePros & Cons: Pepperstone vs XM
- Razor: 0.0 to 0.1 pip EUR/USD raw, $7 round-turn, confirmed over 14 days
- Skrill withdrawals settled in 3 to 8 hours, zero broker fee
- cTrader, native TradingView and free Capitalise.ai automation
- Live chat: 1 min 30 sec average, 80% resolved first contact
- No inactivity fee on any account
- FCA 684312, ASIC 414530, CySEC 388/20, DFSA F004356 plus BaFin and SCB
- Standard spread at ~1.0 pip, above XM Ultra Low at 0.6 pip
- Education content thinner than XM's multi-language programme
- $5 Micro account with 0.01-lot sizing for new traders
- FCA 705428 with FSCS cover and DFSA F003484 for UAE onshore
- Ultra Low at 0.6 pip beats Pepperstone Standard commission-free
- 1,400+ instruments including ~1,300 single-name stock CFDs
- Live webinars and on-demand education in nine languages
- Leverage up to 1:1000 on offshore entity
- Skrill withdrawals took 12 to 36 hours versus 3 to 8 at Pepperstone
- Inactivity fee applies after extended dormancy
Who Should Pick Which
Match your profile to the broker that fits it.
- An active or intraday trader where cTrader and raw ECN pricing matter
- Withdrawing often and want e-wallet payouts in hours
- Trading from the UK, UAE, Australia or Germany with onshore entity cover
- Using TradingView and want native order routing without a workaround
- Focused on forex pairs, with access to 90 pairs versus XM’s 57
- New to forex and want a $5 live-trading entry with micro-lot sizing
- A UK or UAE retail client who wants onshore FCA or DFSA cover
- Learning and want live webinars and on-demand education
- Trading a broad range including ~1,300 single-name stock CFDs
- Comfortable with slower payouts in exchange for instrument breadth
Bottom Line: Pepperstone vs XM
XM takes the narrow overall win at 9.1 to 9.0. It carries the stronger safety score at 9.5, the deeper education library, and the $5 entry with micro accounts. Pepperstone answers with cTrader plus native TradingView, no inactivity fee and faster e-wallet withdrawals.
- Pick Pepperstone if cTrader, raw ECN pricing and faster payouts decide it
- Pick XM if you are new and want a $5 entry, structured education and 1,400 instruments
- Brand new to forex? Start with XM
- Active trader focused on platform quality and e-wallet speed? Go with Pepperstone
Best for active traders
Best for active traders wanting cTrader, raw ECN pricing and fast withdrawals.
- Razor EUR/USD averaged 0.0 to 0.1 pips, $7 round-turn
- Skrill withdrawals confirmed in 3 to 8 hours
- Regulated: FCA 684312, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA
Visit Pepperstone
Best for beginners
Best for new traders wanting a $5 start, multi-language education and 1,400 instruments.
- $5 Micro account, 0.01-lot sizing
- 1,400+ instruments, education in 9 languages
- Regulated: CySEC, FCA 705428, ASIC, DFSA
Visit XM Group
For the full per-account detail, read our Pepperstone review and our XM Group review. Both were tested against the same testing methodology.
CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money. Affiliate disclosure: how we earn. Reviewed by Laura West, last updated 2026-08-12.
Scorecard: Pepperstone vs XM Group
Star ratings out of 5, converted from our tested 10-point scores for each broker.
| Dimension | Pepperstone | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Cost & Fees | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Safety | 9.4 | 9.5 |
| Platforms | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Withdrawals | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Support | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Education | 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Instruments | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| Mobile | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Overall | 9.0 | 9.1 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is safer, Pepperstone or XM?
Both are safe, and the gap is narrow. XM scores 9.5 on safety against Pepperstone at 9.4. Both hold a direct FCA licence with FSCS cover up to GBP 85,000 for UK retail clients: XM under FCA 705428 and Pepperstone under FCA 684312. Both also run onshore Dubai DFSA entities and ASIC licences in Australia. The difference is breadth. Pepperstone holds six regulated entities including BaFin oversight in Germany and an SCB licence in the Bahamas, while XM holds four (CySEC, ASIC, FCA and DFSA). Both keep client funds in segregated bank accounts, offer negative balance protection, and neither has a current enforcement action on file. For a UK or EU trader the FSCS and ICF cover is identical, so this comes down to a rounding difference rather than a real safety gap.
Who is cheaper for active trading, Pepperstone or XM?
Pepperstone is cheaper on the raw tier for most active traders. Its Razor account averaged 0.0 to 0.1 pip on EUR/USD across my 14-day test at a $7 round-turn commission, so roughly $8 effective per lot. XM's Zero account matches the raw spread but charges $3.50 per side, also $7 round-turn, so it lands at about the same $8 per lot. Where Pepperstone pulls ahead is the platform stack and no inactivity fee, and its fees score is 9.2 against XM at 8.8. On the commission-free side it is split: XM's entry Standard account is wider at 1.7 pip on EUR/USD versus Pepperstone's Standard near 1.0 pip, but XM's Ultra Low account tightens to 0.6 pip once you fund its $50 minimum. Match the account tier to how you trade before comparing headline numbers.
Which accepts UAE clients, Pepperstone or XM?
Both accept UAE clients, and both hold an onshore Dubai DFSA licence inside the Dubai International Financial Centre: Pepperstone under DFSA F004356 and XM under DFSA F003484. That means Gulf traders are served by a locally regulated entity rather than a passported offshore licence. Both run Islamic swap-free overlays covering major currency pairs and metals for GCC clients, and both offer Arabic live chat. In my testing Arabic support answered inside two minutes at Pepperstone and within a few minutes at XM. For an onshore-regulated UAE presence the two are level, so the deciding factor is usually cost and platform rather than availability.
Which is better for beginners, Pepperstone or XM?
XM is the stronger beginner pick. It opens at a $5 minimum with a Micro account that sizes positions in small increments, so a new trader can risk very little while learning. XM also runs the deepest education programme in this pairing, with live webinars, an on-demand academy and regular market sessions, which lifts its education score to 9.5 against Pepperstone at 8.4. Pepperstone counters with an even lower $0 entry and direct FCA cover, so it is not a weak choice for beginners, but its learning content is thinner. If structured education and tiny position sizing matter most, XM fits better. If you want the lowest possible cost from day one, Pepperstone still competes.
Which has faster withdrawals, Pepperstone or XM?
Pepperstone is faster on e-wallets. Across my test cycles its Skrill and Neteller payouts settled in 3 to 8 hours at zero fee. XM's Skrill payouts took 1 to 2 business days, with a test withdrawal arriving in about 36 hours, and SEPA transfers settled in 2 business days against 1 at Pepperstone. Card refunds run at a similar 3 to 5 business days on both, so the gap is really about e-wallet speed. Pepperstone also charges no inactivity fee on any account, where XM applies a dormancy charge after a period of no trading. Both processed every cycle without a manual review, so neither is slow in absolute terms, but Pepperstone clears e-wallets noticeably quicker.
Which has higher leverage and more instruments, Pepperstone or XM?
XM wins both. On its offshore entity XM offers leverage up to 1:1000 against Pepperstone's 1:500 cap, though UK and EU clients of either broker are limited to 1:30 under FCA and ESMA rules. On instruments XM lists roughly 1,400 across forex, stocks, indices, commodities, metals, energies and crypto CFDs, while Pepperstone lists about 1,200. One nuance: Pepperstone actually offers more currency pairs, around 90 against XM's 57, so a pure forex trader may prefer its book depth. If you want maximum leverage and the widest overall instrument menu, XM is ahead.
Can I open accounts at both Pepperstone and XM?
Yes. There is no restriction on holding live accounts at both brokers at once, and many active traders do exactly that. A split that works well: keep a Pepperstone Razor account for raw ECN pricing, cTrader and free Capitalise.ai automation, and run an XM Micro or Standard account for the education content, high leverage and any regional deposit bonus. Each broker runs its own KYC (identity verification), so you verify identity documents twice, and each pays withdrawals back to the original deposit method. Keep both document sets current to avoid a withdrawal pause on either side.