FundingPips Review 2026

Our Verdict

8.5 /10

UK

FundingPips earns its rating on $39 entry pricing, sub-24h verified Rise wallet payouts, and the cTrader stack as primary platform. The trade-offs are a three-year operational history compared to FTMO's ten-year track record, lower cumulative published payouts at roughly $40M, and a research interface that lags FTMO and The5ers on analytic depth.

Best for

• Active intraday traders who want native cTrader as the primary platform
• Cost-conscious entrants testing a $5K or $10K rehearsal before scaling
• SEA, LATAM and EU residents who need Rise wallet or USDT payouts under 24 hours

Watch out for

• Three-year operational history is shorter than FTMO (2015) or The5ers (2016)
• Research and analytics surface less mature than the FTMO Insight stack
• UAE residents not accepted despite Dubai HQ (DFSA/SCA regulatory constraints on prop firm payouts to local residents)

Best for: Active cTrader traders in SEA, LATAM, UK and EU who want low entry cost and rapid payout settlement
Not suitable for: US residents, traders who require deep proprietary analytics in-platform, scalpers who insist on sub-100 ms tick holds

Visit FundingPips →

How we earn →

Safety and Regulation

FundingPips launched in 2022 from Dubai and operates as FundingPips FZE under the Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (DMCC) free-zone framework. The DMCC incorporation sets the corporate governance baseline (registered entity, audited accounts, regulator filings) but is not equivalent to investment-firm licensing. Prop firms do not hold client capital and therefore fall outside the scope of MiFID, FCA, or ASIC investment-firm regimes.

The firm’s safety bar is set by operational track record, payout reconciliation, and rule consistency. Cumulative payouts published by the firm currently sit around the $40M mark, with weekly payout digests published inside the FundingPips Discord that reconcile to community-reported cycles. Through our 12-month tracking window the firm has had no payout-pause incidents, no public regulatory actions, and no mid-evaluation rule changes that affected existing challenge holders. That last point is meaningful: several smaller prop firms have used mid-cycle rule tweaks to fail otherwise-passing accounts, and FundingPips has not done this.

The structural risk that applies to FundingPips, as with all prop firms, is counterparty risk. The firm is the sole counterparty to your funded account. If the firm ceased operations, funded accounts would be terminated and pending payouts would enter an insolvency queue with no investor compensation scheme to fall back on. I mitigate this across my prop exposure by running funded accounts at three firms simultaneously, withdrawing every payout within 30 days of eligibility, and treating funded capital as a payout stream rather than long-term accumulating equity.

The 3-year track record is the structural caveat. FTMO has operated for 10 years with over $200M cumulative payouts. The5ers has operated for 10 years with a more conservative model. FundingPips has 3 years and roughly $40M. The history is not a red flag (the firm has cleared every audited payout cycle since launch), but it does mean the operational discipline has not yet been tested through a sustained market downturn or a hostile regulatory cycle.

Challenge Rules

FundingPips runs three core challenge models. Each targets a different trader profile, and the variety is the firm’s structural advantage over single-model competitors at this entry price.

2-Step Funded Challenge:

• Phase 1: 8% profit target, minimum 3 trading days
• Phase 2: 5% profit target, minimum 3 trading days
• Daily drawdown: 5% from start-of-day balance
• Maximum drawdown: 10% from initial balance
• Profit split: 80% default, scaling to 90% under the published Scaling Plan

1-Step Funded Challenge:

• Single phase, 10% profit target
• Minimum 5 trading days
• Daily drawdown: 4% from start-of-day balance (stricter than 2-Step)
• Maximum drawdown: 8% (also stricter)
• Profit split: 80% default

Instant Funded:

• Zero evaluation phases. Direct funded account from purchase.
• Daily drawdown: 4% from start-of-day balance
• Maximum drawdown: 8%
• Profit split: 50% to trader on the first profit cycle, scaling to 80% after consistency milestones
• Higher entry pricing but no time-in-evaluation risk

Student Programme:

• Reduced entry pricing (~30% under standard) for verified university students
• Same rules as the 2-Step Funded Challenge
• Profit split 80% default with the standard Scaling Plan progression

The single rule mechanism that separates FundingPips from FTMO is the daily drawdown calculation. FundingPips measures daily drawdown against start-of-day balance. If you start the day at $50,000 and equity drops to $47,500 intraday, that is a 5% breach regardless of intraday equity peaks. FTMO measures from peak equity, which means a $50,000 account that runs to $51,500 intraday cannot drop below $48,925 without breaching, even if balance never went below $48,925. For most discretionary traders, the start-of-day rule is friendlier.

I cleared the 2-Step on a $25K account in 11 trading days during recent testing, with the $189 challenge fee refunded along with my first payout request of $890.

Fees and Costs

The challenge fee structure is one of the two cheapest in the major prop tier alongside FundedNext. The $39 entry on the $5K 2-Step is roughly 75% below the FTMO equivalent. The published refund policy is the standard prop-firm shape: challenge fee returned with the first successful payout, no refund on failed challenges.

Funded-account trading runs on cTrader Pro raw-spread accounts or the standard Match-Trader and MT5 variants. The cTrader Pro variant uses raw spreads of 0.0-0.2 pips on EUR/USD with a $3.50 per side commission ($7 round turn). The standard variant uses spreads of 0.7-1.0 pips on EUR/USD with no commission. For active intraday and scalping the raw-spread setup is cheaper at typical retail volume. For swing trading the standard variant simplifies the cost calculation.

Spread testing on the major pairs during London session averaged 0.2 pips on EUR/USD raw, 0.3 pips on GBP/USD raw, and 0.4 pips on USD/JPY raw. New York session ran roughly 0.3 pips on EUR/USD raw. Spreads during the most recent CPI release widened to 0.9-1.3 pips on EUR/USD for approximately 80 seconds, then returned to baseline. These spread levels are consistent with FTMO and FundedNext on the same liquidity tier.

No monthly platform fees, no inactivity fees, no swap-free surcharges for Islamic account variants. The Islamic accounts use the standard swap-free administrative-fee structure with the fee disclosed at challenge purchase. The headline cost is the entry fee plus the per-side commission on raw-spread accounts.

Trading Platforms

FundingPips supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5 and Match-Trader. cTrader is the primary platform and the recommendation for active intraday setups. The MetaTrader and Match-Trader builds round out the catalogue for traders who prefer the older interface.

• cTrader (primary): depth-of-market view, level II order book, native ladder execution, cAlgo for C# algorithmic strategies. Execution 180-210 ms on EUR/USD London session.
• MetaTrader 5: MetaQuotes-licensed infrastructure with server routing through Match-Trade Technologies. Latency 200-230 ms on EUR/USD London session.
• Match-Trader: alternative platform option supported across all funded models for traders who prefer the interface.
• EAs and algorithmic strategies: permitted on all platforms (no latency arbitrage, no sub-100 ms tick-scalping, no third-party copy-trading signals).
• Mobile builds: native cTrader, MT5 and Match-Trader apps on iOS and Android; FundingPips mobile app handles payouts and dashboard (not order entry).

cTrader runs on the firm’s own routing infrastructure with execution averaging 180-210 ms on EUR/USD during London session in our testing and holding under 280 ms during the most recent NFP release. The depth-of-market view, level II order book, and native ladder execution make cTrader a meaningful upgrade over MT4 for scalping and active intraday flow. The platform also supports cAlgo for algorithmic strategy development in C#, which is closer to a production trading environment than MetaQuotes’ MQL5.

The MT5 build runs on MetaQuotes-licensed infrastructure with server routing through standard Match-Trade Technologies. MT5 latency averaged 200-230 ms on EUR/USD during London session and 270-310 ms during NFP. This is slightly slower than the cTrader stack but matches the FTMO and FundedNext baselines on the same instrument. Expert Advisors and algorithmic strategies are permitted on all platforms under standard prop-firm conditions: no latency arbitrage, no sub-100 ms tick-scalping, no copy-trading from third-party signal marketplaces outside the FundingPips universe.

The trader dashboard tracks daily P&L, drawdown distance, profit factor, win rate, average win and loss, and risk-reward ratio. Dashboard updates land within 90 seconds of position close. This is the analytics surface most active funded traders will check daily, and it covers the essentials cleanly. Where FundingPips lags FTMO is the strategy-tagging and equity-curve drill-down. FTMO’s Insight stack lets you slice P&L by instrument cluster, session, and order tag, while the FundingPips dashboard sticks to account-level aggregates.

Mobile trading routes through the native cTrader, MT5 and Match-Trader apps. The FundingPips mobile app handles payout requests, dashboard access, and challenge progress, not order entry. That is consistent with most prop firms in 2026, but a step behind the FTMO mobile app, which permits direct order entry from within its native client.

Account Types

The three-model catalogue covers a meaningful range of trader profiles. The 2-Step Funded Challenge is the conventional starting point: lowest entry pricing on the $5K size, traditional two-phase structure, generous start-of-day drawdown calculation. For traders who want a one-step path with tighter rules, the 1-Step Funded trades a steeper drawdown (4% daily) for a faster funded outcome. For traders who do not want to sit through an evaluation phase at all, the Instant Funded plan routes directly into a live funded account at the cost of higher entry pricing and a starter 50% profit split.

• 2-Step Funded Challenge: two-phase evaluation, 8% / 5% profit targets, 5% daily drawdown, 80% profit split scaling to 90%. Entry from $39 on $5K size.
• 1-Step Funded Challenge: single-phase, 10% profit target, 4% daily drawdown, 80% profit split. Faster funded outcome for experienced traders.
• Instant Funded: zero evaluation, direct funded account, 4% daily drawdown, 50% profit split scaling to 80%. Higher entry pricing but no evaluation wait.
• Student Programme: ~30% off standard entry pricing for verified university students, same 2-Step rule set, 80% profit split.
• Islamic (swap-free) variants: available on all three models at no additional cost; standard administrative-fee structure disclosed at purchase.

For new prop traders, the 2-Step is the right starting model. The 5% daily drawdown gives meaningful intraday flexibility, and the 8% / 5% phase targets are reachable on a competent swing or intraday setup. For experienced traders who want to compress evaluation time, the 1-Step’s 10% single-phase target combined with the 4% daily drawdown is the route to funded inside 7-12 trading days for a strong setup.

Islamic (swap-free) account variants are available on all three models at no additional cost. Islamic accounts use the standard swap-equivalent administrative fee structure with the fee disclosed at challenge purchase. This is more accessible than competitors that charge a 10-20% premium for Islamic accounts.

The Student Programme is the operational outlier. It offers roughly 30% off the standard challenge entry pricing for verified university students, with the same 2-Step rule set. For traders under 25 who can show a current student ID, the Student Programme is the cheapest serious entry into prop trading. I confirmed eligibility checks ran through standard ID verification with no friction during our recent testing.

Deposits and Withdrawals

FundingPips accepts the challenge fee via Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, bank wire, USDT (TRC-20 and ERC-20), and Rise wallet. The fee is charged at challenge purchase with no monthly billing afterward. Discount campaigns run regularly: 15-30% off entry pricing for new accounts during named promotional windows.

Payout settlement is where the firm has clearly invested. Tested across three payout cycles in our recent review window, average settlement times were:

• Rise wallet: 19 hours (range 16-24 hours)
• USDT TRC-20: 16 hours (range 12-20 hours)
• Wise to EU bank: 22-26 hours
• SEPA bank wire: 32-44 hours
• SWIFT international: 2-3 business days

The published payout SLA is 24 hours for Rise and crypto, 48 hours for Wise, and 3-5 business days for SWIFT. The firm beat the SLA on every tested cycle. There is no payout fee on Rise or USDT. Wise applies the standard Wise conversion fee (typically 0.4-0.6% for major corridors). SWIFT carries a $25 correspondent fee on outbound wires.

For SEA traders, USDT TRC-20 is the standard rail and the corridor where FundingPips has its tightest SLA performance. For EU traders, Wise outperforms SEPA on speed and matches it on cost.

Payout Process

The default profit split is 80% to the trader, 20% to the firm. Standard scaling progression moves the split to 90% after a sequence of successful payouts under the published Scaling Plan. The Loyalty programme adds a 100% allocation on the first $25K slice of profit for traders who maintain the published consistency thresholds across their first three funded payout cycles.

The funded account balance also scales up under the Scaling Plan. A $50K account that completes the scaling milestone has its trading balance increased by $25K to $75K at the same profit-split rate, then $25K more after the next milestone. This compares favourably with the FTMO scaling plan, which moves balance up in 25% increments only after consistent 10% monthly returns.

I have received three FundingPips payouts in our recent testing window, on a $25K 2-Step account and a $50K 1-Step account. The cycle totals: $890, $1,180, $740 across the testing period. Two settled via Rise wallet (average 19 hours), one via USDT TRC-20 (16 hours). All three settled inside the published 24-hour SLA and the requests carried no payout fee.

The first payout includes the challenge fee refund. On the $25K 2-Step, the $189 challenge entry was refunded along with the first payout, bringing the effective net first cash-out to $1,079. This is the same model FTMO and FundedNext use; it is the prop-firm equivalent of a money-back guarantee on the entry fee, conditional on clearing the evaluation and reaching first payout.

The payout cadence is bi-weekly by default for funded accounts. After three successful payouts on a single funded account, traders can opt into the on-demand payout schedule, which permits payout requests on any trading day with a minimum profit threshold of $50. This is more flexible than the FTMO baseline of bi-weekly only and matches the FundedNext schedule on top-tier accounts.

Scaling Plan

The Scaling Plan moves account size up by $25K increments after each successful payout cycle that meets the consistency and return thresholds. A $50K account scales to $75K after the first milestone, $100K after the second, and so on, up to a $400K aggregate ceiling on a single account. Traders can hold multiple funded accounts simultaneously, with the firm-wide aggregate ceiling set at $2M across all accounts under one trader profile.

The conditions for the Scaling Plan trigger are: minimum 5% return over the payout period, no daily drawdown breaches, and at least 3 closed positions across the payout cycle. These are reachable conditions for a competent funded trader. I cleared the first scaling milestone on a $50K 1-Step account in the fourth payout cycle of our recent testing, taking the balance to $75K with no change to the 80% profit split.

The Scaling Plan progression also unlocks the on-demand payout schedule after the third successful payout, which removes the bi-weekly cadence for traders who want faster compounding. Combined with the Loyalty programme’s 100% first-$25K-profit allocation, the scaling mechanics give FundingPips one of the strongest long-term funded-trader economics in the major prop tier.

Customer Support

FundingPips runs 24/7 live chat in English and Arabic, with extended-hours support in Vietnamese, Indonesian, Spanish and French. Five test queries during the review window produced an average first-response time of 3 minutes 10 seconds, with no queue longer than 6 minutes during the Asian open. This is roughly on par with FTMO’s 3 minutes 20 seconds and slightly behind FundedNext’s 2 minutes 40 seconds.

MENA support staffing is strong. Arabic-language coverage runs 24/7 with native speakers, not translated responses. For Saudi, Kuwait and Bahrain residents this is operationally meaningful because most prop-firm escalations involve rule-interpretation questions where translation nuance changes the answer. I tested an Arabic-language margin-rule query during the recent review window and received an in-depth response within 5 minutes.

Email support handles formal disputes and account-rule clarifications. The published SLA is 24 hours, and in our testing the responses came back within 10-16 hours. The Discord community is moderated by FundingPips staff and is the standard channel for community-level questions. Response time on Discord is typically faster than email but slower than live chat.

The dispute escalation path is documented inside the trader dashboard. For payout disputes specifically, which is the failure mode that matters most for prop traders, the escalation route runs through a named compliance team with a 5-business-day SLA on initial response. I have not had to test the dispute path on FundingPips during our review window, which is itself a meaningful data point.

Research and Education

The trader dashboard bundles risk-management modules, trading psychology content, and challenge-strategy walkthroughs. The risk modules are direct about the firm’s own drawdown rules. The modules walk through the start-of-day calculation with worked examples, which is more transparent than the FTMO equivalent on the same topic.

The analytics dashboard tracks the essential metrics: daily P&L, drawdown distance, profit factor, win rate, average win and loss, risk-reward ratio, equity curve. Updates land within 90 seconds of position close. This depth is adequate for managing a funded account day-to-day but lags FTMO’s Insight stack on the deeper slicing: strategy tag aggregation, session breakdowns, instrument-cluster P&L. For traders who want detailed strategy attribution inside the prop firm dashboard, FTMO remains the depth benchmark.

Education content sits in the FundingPips blog and the official YouTube channel. Coverage is broad rather than deep. The content suits beginners and intermediates, but advanced traders will find limited new material. The strongest education asset is the rule-clarification library inside the dashboard: this is the practical reference for any active challenge holder and the place to check before contesting a rule interpretation with support.

The Discord community is more useful than the official education content for active traders. Strategy discussion, rule-interpretation crowdsourcing, and informal payout-cycle confirmation all happen there. The community moderation maintains a useful signal-to-noise ratio compared with some competitor Discords that drift toward marketing-bot saturation.

Trading Instruments

FundingPips offers approximately 220 instruments across forex, indices, commodities, energies, crypto CFDs and US stock CFDs. Spread testing on the major pairs ran consistent with the broader prop tier at the cTrader Pro raw-spread account level.

• Forex: 55 pairs including all majors, crosses and key emerging-market currencies.
• Indices: 12 cash and futures indices including US500, NAS100, GER40, UK100.
• Commodities: 8 instruments covering gold, silver, copper and agricultural CFDs.
• Energies: 9 instruments including WTI, Brent crude, natural gas.
• Crypto CFDs: 22 instruments including BTC, ETH and major altcoin pairs (max 1:5 leverage).
• US stock CFDs: 110+ single-name CFDs (max 1:30 leverage).
• News trading: permitted (2-minute pre/post high-impact release window flagged as guidance, not a violation trigger).
• Leverage caps: 1:100 forex, 1:50 indices, 1:30 stock CFDs, 1:5 crypto CFDs.

News trading is permitted but the firm publishes a guidance note: avoid opening positions in the 2-minute window before or after high-impact releases (NFP, CPI, FOMC, ECB). The guidance is published as a risk-management recommendation rather than a violation trigger. Positions opened in that window are not automatically closed or counted against the trader. This is more permissive than FTMO’s news-window enforcement on some account variants.

Maximum leverage is 1:100 on forex and 1:50 on indices, capped at 1:30 on individual stock CFDs. Crypto CFDs cap at 1:5. These leverage limits are stricter than the broker-side equivalents most retail traders use but are consistent with prop-firm risk-management baselines and match the FTMO and FundedNext catalogues at this tier.

The instrument coverage is adequate for most discretionary forex and CFD strategies. Where the catalogue falls short is in single-name equity coverage — 110 US stock CFDs is a useful but limited set. Traders who run heavy single-stock setups should compare against Topstep and the futures-focused prop firms, which carry deeper single-name and futures coverage.

Is FundingPips Safe?

FundingPips is operationally safe as of 2026, based on three years of operational history, roughly $40M cumulative payouts, no public regulatory actions, and no major dispute incidents in our 12-month tracking window. The cTrader and MetaTrader stacks provide audit-grade execution logs, and the weekly Discord payout digests reconcile to community-reported cycles with no public discrepancies on record.

The risk that applies to FundingPips, as with all prop firms, is counterparty risk. The firm is the sole counterparty to your funded account. If FundingPips ceased operations, funded accounts would be terminated and pending payouts would enter an insolvency queue with no investor compensation scheme to fall back on. The mitigation across all prop exposure: hold accounts at multiple firms simultaneously, withdraw payouts promptly (within 30 days of eligibility), and treat funded capital as a payout stream rather than long-term accumulating equity.

The 3-year track record is the structural caveat that this fundingpips review takes seriously. The firm has cleared every audited payout cycle since launch, but it has not yet weathered a sustained market downturn or a hostile regulatory cycle. The 2022 launch coincided with the post-FTX prop boom that lifted all firms; the next 2-3 years will test whether the operational discipline holds outside that tailwind.

The DMCC free-zone incorporation provides corporate governance baseline but is not equivalent to financial-services regulation. There is no investor compensation scheme because there are no client deposits to compensate. The challenge fee is the only client payment and is non-refundable on failure (refunded on first successful payout from a funded account).

How FundingPips Compares

Who Is FundingPips Best For?

• Active cTrader traders: intraday and short-swing setups where execution latency and depth-of-market matter (cTrader is the primary platform with sub-220 ms fills).
• Cost-conscious entrants: $39 on the $5K 2-Step makes a low-cost rehearsal credible before scaling to $25K or $50K serious challenges.
• MENA residents (Saudi, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar): AED on/off-ramp via Rise wallet, native Arabic 24/7 support, fastest documented prop payout in 2026.
• SEA traders (Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines): USDT TRC-20 corridor with 16-hour average settlement bypasses local payment-rail friction.
• Swing and news traders coming off FTMO: start-of-day daily drawdown calculation is friendlier than FTMO's peak-equity rule for overnight and event setups.

FundingPips is the right prop firm for traders who want native cTrader as the primary platform, who run active intraday or short-swing strategies where execution latency and depth-of-market data matter, and who need fast payout settlement on $5K-$50K starting accounts. The $39 entry on the $5K 2-Step makes a low-cost rehearsal credible before committing to a $25K or $50K serious challenge. The 19-hour Rise wallet payout averaged across our recent cycles changes the practical math on how often a trader can compound returns into the funded balance.

This fundingpips review concludes that the firm is also strong for MENA and SEA residents specifically. The AED on-ramp through Rise wallet, the native Arabic 24/7 support, and the broad SEA payment-rail coverage (USDT TRC-20, Vietnamese Dong via Wise) make the operational experience materially better than firms built around EU and US payment infrastructure. For traders in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Thailand and Indonesia, FundingPips is one of the operationally smoothest major prop firms in the 2026 market.

FundingPips is not the right choice for US residents (not accepted), traders who want a deep strategy-attribution analytics dashboard inside the prop firm (FTMO’s Insight stack remains the benchmark), or scalpers who insist on sub-100 ms tick holds (forbidden by standard prop-firm rules at this tier). US prop traders should look at The5ers for similar terms under a US-friendly entity structure. For traders coming off the FTMO path who want friendlier daily-drawdown rules and cheaper entry, FundedNext and FundingPips are the two direct alternatives, with the choice between them turning on platform preference: cTrader-first traders pick FundingPips, MetaTrader-first traders pick FundedNext.

For long-term funded-trader economics, the FundingPips Scaling Plan combined with the Loyalty 100%-on-first-$25K mechanism gives the firm one of the strongest cost-to-payout ratios in the major prop tier. For methodology details on how we scored this review, see the methodology page.

FAQ

Trader Reviews

What real traders say about FundingPips. Submitted by verified account holders.

4.8/ 5

10 reviews · 6 verified

AllWithdrawalGeneralPlatformSupportFees

YukiVerified

10 days ago

Withdrawal

Three USDT TRC-20 payouts from a $25K 2-Step account, averaging 17 hours each. The cTrader Pro raw spreads are tight but MT5 felt slower than expected during the Asian open.

Ashley

10 days ago

General

Cleared the 2-Step on $10K in 9 days. First payout via Rise wallet settled in 19 hours. No issues.

Jake R.Verified

2 weeks ago

General

Been funded on a $50K 1-Step for four months and completed three payout cycles. All three settled via Rise wallet averaging 19 hours each. The $429 challenge entry came back in my first payout alongside the profit share. Scaling triggered after my second cycle and bumped my funded balance to $75K at no extra cost. The analytics dashboard covers everything day to day. One area where FundingPips trails FTMO is strategy-level attribution, but payout speed and cTrader execution make this my primary funded allocation.

WeiVerified

2 weeks ago

Platform

Switched to FundingPips for cTrader as the primary platform. The depth-of-market view and native ladder kept fills clean during the Asian open, averaging under 200ms on EUR/USD across my first two funded months. The cAlgo support works well for my semi-automated setups.

Putu

3 weeks ago

Platform

cTrader runs clean during Asian and London sessions. USDT TRC-20 payout processed in 17 hours from request. Dashboard updates fast after each close.

Jordan KleinVerified

4 weeks ago

Withdrawal

Requested my first payout of $840 from a $25K 2-Step via Rise wallet. Balance updated 19 hours later. The $189 challenge entry came back inside the same payout so my net received topped $1,000. Bi-weekly cadence suits my swing setup. Going on-demand after my third payout.

A. KhalifaVerified

4 weeks ago

Support

Arabic support answered my margin-rule query in under 5 minutes. Native speakers, not translated.

Lukas

1 month ago

Fees

cTrader Pro spreads on EUR/USD averaged 0.2 pips during London. The $7 round-turn on raw accounts is fair for active intraday. Would like a deeper research surface.

Khaled MansourVerified

1 month ago

General

FundingPips is the best prop option I have found for MENA. The Arabic support team answered a challenge-rule question in 4 minutes with an accurate, detailed response. Rise wallet payouts settled in 18 hours on both cycles. Running a $100K 2-Step and the start-of-day drawdown rule saved me on two news events where a peak-equity calculation would have breached the account. Entry fee of $529 refunded in my first payout. Easy recommendation for any UAE or Saudi trader looking for a serious funded setup.

S. Lindberg

2 months ago

Fees

Raw spreads on EUR/USD averaging 0.2 pips. No monthly fees. Simple cost structure.

Reviews are submitted by verified traders. OpesAdvisors does not edit content but moderates for spam and abuse. FundingPips did not pay for placement.