- Best for Beginners
- Best for Bonus seekers
- Best for Education
- Best for MT4 / MT5
- Min deposit
- $5
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:1000
- Regulation
- CySEC · ASIC
10 cTrader brokers tested with live capital. Real spreads, real commissions, and every licence verified on the public register.
62+ forex brokers tested by Laura West · real funded accounts
For a cTrader account I would open with FP Markets first: it runs cTrader natively on a Raw ECN book, holds three regulators led by Australia's ASIC, and starts at a $100 deposit with commission near $6 per lot round-turn. It is the broker on this list I have partnered with and vetted, so it leads even though a couple of rivals score a touch higher. If raw cost is all you care about, Fusion Markets is the cheapest cTrader venue I measured, roughly $5.20 per lot all in on its Zero account with no minimum deposit. For the deepest cTrader liquidity and the fastest fills, IC Markets is the specialist, since more traders route cTrader orders through it than anywhere else here. Every licence below was checked on the regulator's own public register in 2026, and every score is the real tested number, never nudged for a partner.
One winner per vertical · region-aware ordering
Worldwide editorial picks
your country
No partner broker on our shortlist legally acceptsforextraders fromyour country. Two verticals stay open to you.
| # | Broker | Our score | Regulation | Min Dep | Spread | Leverage | Open account |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | FCAASIC +2 | $5 | 0.6 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 2 | | FCAASIC +2 | $50 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 3 | | FCAASIC +2 | $50 | 1.0 pips | 1:30 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 4 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:Unlimited | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 5 | | FCAASIC +4 | $0 | 0.7 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 6 | | ASICVFSC +1 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 7 | | FCAASIC +9 | $250 | 0.85 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 8 | | FCAASIC +4 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 9 | | FCAASIC +6 | $0 | 0.4 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 10 | | FCADFSA +2 | $0 | 0.5 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 11 | | ASICFSCA +1 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 12 | | ASICCySEC +1 | $200 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 13 | | ASICFSCA +7 | $100 | 0.9 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 14 | | FCADFSA +3 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 15 | | FCAASIC +8 | $0 | 0.1 pips | 1:50 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 16 | | FCAASIC +6 | $0 | 1.2 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 17 | | FCAASIC +6 | $100 | 0.6 pips | 1:300 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 18 | | FCAFSCA +3 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 19 | | FCAASIC +2 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 20 | | FCAASIC +6 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 21 | | FMAFSA Seychelles | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 22 | | FCAASIC +4 | $20 | 0.6 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 23 | | FCAASIC +1 | $250 | 0.5 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 24 | | FCAFSCA +3 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:2000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 25 | | FCADFSA +4 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:2000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 26 | | FCAFINMA +4 | $1000 | 0.6 pips | 1:100 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 27 | | FCACySEC +3 | £1 | 0.6 pips | 1:300 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 28 | | FCA | £1 | 0.6 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 29 | | ASICFMA +1 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 30 | | FCACSSF +2 | $0 | 0.5 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 31 | | ASICVFSC | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 32 | | FCAASIC +4 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 33 | | ASICCySEC +2 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 34 | | FCAASIC +4 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 35 | | FCAASIC +2 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 36 | | FINMAJFSA +1 | $100 | 0.1 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 37 | | ASICFSCA +3 | $25 | 0.7 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 38 | | FSC BelizeTFC member (compensation up to €20,000) | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:2000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 39 | | CySECFSA Seychelles | $100 | 0.7 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 40 | | FCAASIC +2 | $0 | 0.6 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 41 | | MFSA MaltaLabuan FSA +2 | $5 | 0.6 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 42 | | ASICVFSC | $200 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 43 | | FCADFSA +2 | $100 | 0.1 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 44 | | FCACFTC +3 | $0 | 0.6 pips | 1:30 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 45 | | FCAASIC +2 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 46 | | ASICFSCA +1 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 47 | | ASICFSCA +3 | $1 | 0.0 pips | 1:3000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 48 | | FCA | £0 | 0.03% FX (USD-GBP) · £0 stock commission | 1:1 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 49 | | FSCACySEC +3 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:3000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 50 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $100 | 1.0 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 51 | | FCAASIC +2 | $50 | 0.2 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 52 | | FSCACySEC +2 | $5 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 53 | | CySEC | $100 | 0.6 pips | 1:600 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 54 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $100 | 0.6 pips | 1:300 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 55 | | FSCACySEC +2 | $250 | 0.5 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 56 | | FSCACySEC +2 | $25 | 0.6 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 57 | | FSCASLIBC +1 | $50 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 58 | | FCAFSA | $20 | 0.0 pips | 1:Unlimited | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 59 | | FCAASIC +3 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 60 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose |
Every broker on this list is tested on a funded live account. We score 10 dimensions (safety, fees, platforms, accounts, deposits, instruments, support, research, education, mobile) with weights detailed on our methodology page. No broker pays to be ranked higher. Some links earn us a commission, how we make money.
Most “best broker” lists treat the trading platform as a footnote. For a cTrader trader it is the whole point.
You are not just choosing who holds your money. You are choosing whether you get a real order book, one-click ladder trading, and a price feed the broker cannot lean on.
cTrader is the platform built for that. Spotware designed it for no-dealing-desk brokers, so it shows genuine depth-of-market and keeps the broker out of the middle of your fill. That is why it lives almost entirely at ECN and raw-spread brokers, and why a cTrader list looks nothing like a MetaTrader one.
Here is the catch that trips up beginners. Far fewer brokers actually offer cTrader than claim to in comparison articles.
I checked every broker in our review desk, and most of the names you would expect (Exness, XM, eToro, Vantage, AvaTrade) do not run cTrader at all. Some dropped it.
Some never had it.
So this list is short by design: only brokers I confirmed run cTrader as a live account made the cut. No platform padding.
Cost is where the real gap opens up. On a cTrader raw account the all-in cost of EUR/USD runs from about $5.20 per lot at the cheapest broker here to $7 at the priciest. That gap compounds on every single trade, and none of it shows up in a welcome bonus.
Regulation is the safety floor underneath all of it. A tier-1 licence forces three protections a homepage logo cannot fake:
That is why I checked every entry on the regulator’s own public register before scoring a single spread. The platform is identical across all ten brokers. The protection behind your account is not.
One honest note on how this list is ordered. Brokers we have a commercial relationship with are listed first, and we may earn a commission if you open an account through a link here.
It never changes the scores, which come from live testing on the methodology page. Every number stays real: a partner at the top can honestly score below a rival further down.
The full arrangement is on the how we make money page.
One caveat no broker can fix: across these firms, between 74% and 89% of retail accounts lose money, per their own regulatory filings. cTrader gives you a faster, clearer way to place a trade. It does not make the trade a good one.
I did not take any broker’s word for its platform or its licences. For every firm I first confirmed that cTrader was a genuine live account, not a discontinued or comparison-only mention. Then I located the registered legal entity and searched the relevant regulator’s own database.
A quick honesty note on the order, because it matters here. Partners we work with are listed first, then everyone else by tested score.
That is why FP Markets leads at 8.9 even though Pepperstone and Fusion Markets score 9.0. The scores are the real, unchanged tested numbers. The order reflects best fit plus the brokers we have vetted closely enough to partner with, not a nudged rating.
Regulator tier carried the most weight in the score. An FCA or CySEC licence with a compensation scheme outranks an ASIC licence without one, which in turn outranks any offshore-only entity. That weighting is why genuinely cheap offshore brokers land lower even when their cTrader execution is excellent.
Cost came next, measured on live cTrader accounts rather than marketing pages. I captured EUR/USD spreads during the London session on each broker’s raw cTrader account, then added commission to get an all-in figure per lot. To keep it fair I averaged spreads across more than 400 EUR/USD entries per broker.
Platform depth mattered more here than in a general ranking. I tested the cTrader depth-of-market ladder, the fill speed on tick-scalping orders, cBot support, and whether copy trading and VPS were available. Withdrawals and support filled out the rest of the score, with timed payout cycles across card, e-wallet, and bank rails.
| Criterion | Weight | What we measured |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation and safety | 30% | Tier of the licence a typical retail client receives, compensation scheme cover, register verification, segregation, negative balance protection |
| Trading cost | 22% | Live EUR/USD spread captures (400+ entries) plus commission on the raw cTrader account, expressed as all-in round-turn cost per lot |
| cTrader depth and execution | 14% | Depth-of-market quality, fill latency, tick-scalping rejection rate, cBot support, cTrader Copy and VPS availability |
| Withdrawals | 12% | Timed payout cycles across card, e-wallet, and bank rails, plus any friction or rejections |
| Platform range and accounts | 8% | cTrader account tiers, MT4 or MT5 alongside, minimum deposit, Islamic swap-free options, demo access |
| Customer support | 7% | Live-chat response time, language coverage, phone availability, escalation path |
| Research and education | 7% | Daily analysis, economic calendar depth, structured education for beginners |
Scores are out of 10. The regulation weight is deliberately the heaviest, because the strength of the licence is what keeps your deposit safe in the first place. A broker cannot buy back regulation points with a tight cTrader spread, which is why an offshore broker tops out lower no matter how cheap it runs.
Every score above is a weighted blend of the seven criteria in the table. A few points worth spelling out:
Nothing in the scores is extrapolated. Every figure traces to a live account tested in 2026.
The list below is ordered partners first, then by tested score. Every broker here runs cTrader as a genuine live account, verified in 2026. Scores are real and unchanged, so the order is about fit, not a nudged number.
Key facts:
I tested FP Markets with a live account in 2026 and it is my top pick for a cTrader trader. It is also the broker on this list we partner with, and I want that stated plainly. Founded in Sydney in 2005, it runs three onshore entities, and it offers cTrader natively on the Raw ECN account, something most ASIC-regulated brokers skip.
I verified all three entities directly on the public registers:
All three returned active status with no enforcement on file. The protection you get depends on which entity holds your account, so confirm that on your client agreement. For the full safety breakdown, see is FP Markets safe.
FP Markets runs MT4, MT5, cTrader, and IRESS on a single broker relationship. On cTrader you get the full depth-of-market ladder and cBot support, which is the reason a manual scalper picks it over the same broker’s MT5 book. Fills on tick-scalping orders were clean in my testing with no dealing-desk rejection.
It suits Australian, UK, South African, and UAE traders who want cTrader on a genuinely regulated Australian book rather than an offshore one. It is a weaker fit if you need a slick proprietary mobile app, since funding routes through the client portal in a mobile browser.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $100 | 1.0 pip | $0 | 1:30 (EU/UK) |
| Raw ECN (cTrader) | $100 | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $3.00/side | 1:30 (EU/UK) |
There are no platform-side fees on cTrader, MT4, MT5, or IRESS. The cleanest cost picture sits on Raw ECN for active traders and Standard for swing traders running under 2 lots a day. Islamic swap-free is available on qualifying accounts with no expiry cap.
Key facts:
Pepperstone is the most heavily regulated broker in this comparison, and it scores 9.0, the joint highest here. Founded in Melbourne in 2010, it runs cTrader on the Razor account alongside MT4, MT5, and TradingView, all under a single login.
The six-regulator stack is the widest on this list:
All tier-1 entities returned active with no enforcement on file. For the deeper safety and register check, see is Pepperstone regulated and is Pepperstone safe.
The Razor account on cTrader held 0.1 pip on EUR/USD across four weeks of my testing, with genuine depth-of-market and no requotes on tick scalps. What Pepperstone adds over a cTrader-only shop is choice: the same account can trade on MT5 or route orders natively from a TradingView chart.
It suits a scalper or EA trader who wants cTrader on the broadest possible tier-1 licence stack, and who values same-day withdrawals. It is a weaker fit if raw cost is your only metric, since Fusion and FP Markets run cheaper.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0 | 0.6 to 1.0 pip | $0 | 1:30 (EU/UK) |
| Razor (cTrader) | $0 | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $3.50/side | 1:30 (EU/UK) |
No inactivity fee and Islamic swap-free on qualifying accounts. The all-in Razor cost of roughly $7 per lot is a small premium over the cheapest cTrader brokers here, and the regulatory depth is what you are paying for.
Key facts:
Fusion Markets is the price leader, and it scores 9.0. Founded in Melbourne in 2017, its Zero account on cTrader was the cheapest legitimate cTrader venue I measured anywhere.
The honest trade-off: you get the lowest cost on this list, but unless you onboard to the Australian entity, there is no compensation fund behind your account. That single fact keeps it from outranking a tier-1 book on our safety-weighted scale even at a higher raw score.
The Zero account on cTrader averaged 0.1 pip on EUR/USD with a $4.50 round-turn commission, an all-in of roughly $5.20 per lot. That undercuts even IC Markets and Pepperstone. Depth-of-market was solid for a broker this size, and cBots run with free VPS on qualifying volume.
It suits a cost-obsessed scalper who trades enough volume that a $1.80 per lot saving compounds, and who accepts an offshore book to get it. It is a weaker fit for a beginner who wants a compensation scheme, where FP Markets or Pepperstone are the safer doors.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic | $0 | 0.9 pip | $0 | 1:30 (AU) |
| Zero (cTrader) | $0 | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $4.50 round-turn | 1:500 (offshore) |
No inactivity fee. The offshore Zero account offers higher leverage than the ASIC book, which cuts both ways: more flexibility, less protection. Choose the entity knowingly.
Key facts:
If any broker owns cTrader, it is IC Markets. It was the most cTrader-focused review in my whole sample, and it scores 8.8. Founded in Sydney in 2007, its Raw Spread account on cTrader is the closest retail ECN I have used.
All onshore entities returned active. For the register check, see is IC Markets safe and is IC Markets legit.
The single thing IC Markets does better than anyone here on cTrader is liquidity depth. It aggregates a large number of tier-1 bank and non-bank feeds, so the depth-of-market ladder is genuinely populated rather than showing three thin levels. For an order-book scalper or an algo trader running cBots, that depth is the whole reason to be here.
It suits high-frequency and algo traders who want the deepest cTrader book and accept a $200 entry. It is a weaker fit for a beginner on a small balance, where a zero-minimum broker makes more sense.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $200 | 0.8 pip | $0 | 1:30 (EU/AU) |
| Raw Spread (cTrader) | $200 | 0.0 pips | $6 round-turn | 1:30 (EU/AU) |
No platform fee on cTrader, MT4, or MT5. The cTrader Raw commission of $6 round-turn is marginally cheaper than the $7 on the MetaTrader Raw books, a small edge for the same execution.
Key facts:
FxPro is the multi-platform pick, scoring 8.7. Founded in London in 2006, it is one of the few brokers that runs MT4, MT5, cTrader, and its own FxPro platform in parallel under a single login.
The FCA and CySEC entities anchor the stack. Confirm which entity holds your account before funding, since the offshore SCB book carries lighter cover.
The Raw+ account on cTrader has held 0.0 pip on EUR/USD in my testing, with the platform’s usual depth-of-market and cBot support. What FxPro offers that most here do not is genuine platform breadth: if you want to trade the same account on cTrader today and MT5 tomorrow, you can.
It suits a trader who is not yet committed to one platform and wants to keep cTrader, MetaTrader, and a proprietary option all open. It is a weaker fit for a pure cost-minimiser, since Fusion and IC Markets run cheaper on the raw cTrader book.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $100 | 1.2 pip | $0 | 1:30 (EU/UK) |
| Raw+ (cTrader) | $100 | 0.0 to 0.2 pips | ~$4.50 round-turn | 1:30 (EU/UK) |
No platform-side fee on any of the four terminals. FxPro’s edge is optionality, not the lowest headline number.
Key facts:
BlackBull Markets tops our sample on platform breadth, scoring 8.4. Founded in Auckland in 2014, it runs cTrader alongside native TradingView trade routing, MT4, and MT5.
BlackBull is honest that it is not a tier-1 FCA or ASIC broker. That is the reason it scores below the leaders despite excellent platform choice. For the safety detail, see is BlackBull Markets safe.
When I tested the ECN Prime account on cTrader it showed real ECN spreads with a $6 round-turn commission. What sets BlackBull apart is the pairing: cTrader for the order book, native TradingView for charting and order routing, and a broad share CFD universe layered on top.
It suits a trader who wants cTrader and TradingView side by side plus wide instrument coverage, and who is comfortable on an FMA-plus-offshore stack. It is a weaker fit if a tier-1 compensation scheme is non-negotiable.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0 | 0.8 pip | $0 | 1:30 |
| ECN Prime (cTrader) | $0 | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $6 round-turn | 1:500 (offshore) |
No inactivity fee. Higher offshore leverage on ECN Prime, so match the entity to the protection you want.
Key facts:
GO Markets is the Australian specialist, scoring 8.2. Founded in Melbourne in 2006, it is one of the few ASIC brokers that offers cTrader on its home entity rather than reserving it for an offshore book.
The key detail for a cTrader trader: the full cTrader plus TradingView stack is only on the ASIC entity. EU and offshore clients are limited to MT4 and MT5.
When I ran the GO Plus+ raw account, EUR/USD started from 0.0 pip with an all-in cost close to $5 per lot, a touch cheaper than the $6 band at the bigger names. My fills during the Sydney open were clean with no requotes on the majors.
It suits an Australian trader who wants cTrader on a genuine ASIC book at a low cost. It is a weaker fit outside Australia, since the cTrader offer does not follow you to the EU or offshore entities.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0 | 1.0 pip | $0 | 1:30 (AU) |
| GO Plus+ (cTrader, AU) | $0 | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | ~$5 round-turn | 1:30 (AU) |
Free VPS on qualifying volume. The cTrader edge here is Australian-specific, so confirm your entity before you count on it.
Key facts:
Skilling is the beginner-friendly pick, scoring 8.0. Founded in 2016 in Nicosia, it offers cTrader alongside MT4 and its own Skilling Trader platform, with copy trading as a core feature.
CySEC anchors the EU book. The stack is lighter than the FCA-and-ASIC leaders, which is the main reason it scores below them.
When I signed up, Skilling paired cTrader (for traders who want the order book) with a genuinely simple proprietary platform (for those who do not). I found the commission-free standard tier at 0.7 pip friendly for a low-volume beginner who does not want to track per-lot commission, while the Premium tier moves to raw spreads on cTrader for active traders.
It suits a beginner who wants cTrader available as they grow, on a lighter but still CySEC-regulated book, with copy trading built in. It is a weaker fit for a high-volume scalper, where the raw-cost leaders are cheaper.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $100 | 0.7 pip | $0 | 1:30 (EU) |
| Premium (cTrader) | $100 | raw spreads | per-lot commission | 1:30 (EU) |
No commission on the standard tier keeps the cost picture simple for a new trader learning to size positions.
Key facts:
Deriv is the low-entry pick, scoring 7.8. It offers a native Deriv cTrader build (on Spotware’s platform) alongside Deriv MT5 and its own Deriv X, and it is best known for synthetic indices that trade around the clock.
Deriv is a long-running operator (its Binary.com lineage dates to 2000), but the offshore-heavy stack is why it scores below the tier-1 brokers. For the safety and register check, see is Deriv safe and is Deriv legit.
I found the Deriv cTrader app to be the standard Spotware build, so you get the same depth-of-market and cBot support as elsewhere, connected to Deriv’s liquidity. The $5 minimum makes it one of the most accessible cTrader doors for a trader testing the platform with tiny real capital.
It suits a trader who wants to try cTrader at the lowest possible entry, or who is specifically drawn to synthetic indices. It is a weaker fit for a serious forex scalper, where the ECN leaders offer tighter spreads and stronger regulation.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial (cTrader / MT5) | $5 | 0.5 to 0.9 pip | model varies | 1:30 (EU) / 1:1000 (offshore) |
| Synthetic indices | $5 | product-specific | model varies | up to 1:1000 (offshore) |
The very low entry is the headline. Just remember the higher leverage lives on the offshore books, not the MFSA one.
Key facts:
VT Markets rounds out the list at 7.7, and it earns a caution flag on safety that I want stated up front. Founded in Sydney in 2015, it offers cTrader alongside MT4 and MT5 on a raw ECN account, with a strong mobile focus.
The onshore entities are legitimate, but the offshore routing for most flow is the reason it sits last and carries the caution note. Confirm your exact entity before funding.
On the Raw ECN account, EUR/USD ran raw with a commission on top, and USD/JPY held under half a pip during the Tokyo session in testing. The mobile app is a genuine strength for a trader who runs cTrader and MetaTrader from a phone in an emerging market.
It suits a raw-spread mobile trader in SEA, MENA, or Africa who wants cTrader and accepts the offshore trade-off. It is a weaker fit for a trader who wants a tier-1 compensation scheme, where the top of this list is the safer home.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard STP | $100 | 1.0 to 1.2 pip | $0 | 1:30 (AU) |
| Raw ECN (cTrader) | $100 | 0.0 pips | per-lot commission | 1:500 (offshore) |
Match the account to the entity and the protection you want. The higher leverage is offshore only.
The table below puts all ten side by side on the figures that decide fit for a cTrader trader: cost, entry, the cTrader account name, and regulation. Partners are listed first, then by tested score, and every number is the real figure from the sections above. We feature vetted partners first, but every score, spread and licence stays real and tested.
| Broker | Overall score | Min deposit | EUR/USD (cTrader) | Commission | Top regulator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP Markets | 8.9 | $100 | 0.0 pips (Raw ECN) | $6 round-turn | ASIC / CySEC |
| Pepperstone | 9.0 | $0 | 0.1 pips (Razor) | $7 round-turn | FCA / ASIC |
| Fusion Markets | 9.0 | $0 | 0.1 pips (Zero) | $4.50 round-turn | ASIC |
| IC Markets | 8.8 | $200 | 0.0 pips (Raw Spread) | $6 round-turn | ASIC / CySEC |
| FxPro | 8.7 | $100 | 0.0 pips (Raw+) | ~$4.50 round-turn | FCA / CySEC |
| BlackBull Markets | 8.4 | $0 | 0.0 pips (ECN Prime) | $6 round-turn | FMA (NZ) |
| GO Markets | 8.2 | $0 | 0.0 pips (GO Plus+) | ~$5 round-turn | ASIC / CySEC |
| Skilling | 8.0 | $100 | raw (Premium) | per-lot | CySEC |
| Deriv | 7.8 | $5 | 0.5 pips | model varies | MFSA Malta |
| VT Markets | 7.7 | $100 | 0.0 pips (Raw ECN) | per-lot | ASIC / FSCA |
Two patterns jump out. First, the score gap between the top and the bottom is mostly about regulation, not cTrader quality: BlackBull, Deriv, and VT Markets run the same platform, they just carry lighter compensation cover. Second, the cheapest cTrader account (Fusion at about $5.20 per lot) and the strongest regulation (Pepperstone) are not the same broker, so your priority points you to a different row.
The cheapest all-in cost I measured on a cTrader account in 2026 was Fusion Markets Zero at roughly $5.20 per round-turn lot: a 0.1 pip raw spread plus a $4.50 commission. The tier-1 raw group (FP Markets, IC Markets, GO Markets) lands near $5 to $6, and Pepperstone Razor sits at $7, a premium you pay for the broadest licence stack.
For a trader placing 500 round-turn lots a year, the gap between $5.20 and $7 is $900 in annual cost. That is meaningful, but it is far smaller than the gap you would pay stepping down to a spread-only account. The all-in number is the only one that matters.
| Broker | cTrader account | EUR/USD spread | Commission | All-in per lot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Markets | Zero | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $4.50 round-turn | ~$5.20 |
| GO Markets | GO Plus+ | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | ~$5 round-turn | ~$5.00 |
| FxPro | Raw+ | 0.0 to 0.2 pips | ~$4.50 round-turn | ~$5.50 |
| FP Markets | Raw ECN | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $3.00/side | ~$6.00 |
| IC Markets | Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | $6 round-turn | ~$6.00 |
| BlackBull Markets | ECN Prime | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $6 round-turn | ~$6.00 |
| Pepperstone | Razor | 0.0 to 0.1 pips | $3.50/side | ~$7.00 |
cTrader was built for no-dealing-desk brokers, so it almost never uses spread-only pricing on its flagship account. The broker shows a near-zero raw spread and charges a separate flat commission per lot, so you see the true market price and the fee as two separate numbers.
The all-in cost per lot is the only figure that matters, not the model. On EUR/USD, a 0.1 pip spread equals $1 per standard lot, and a $3.00 per-side commission equals $6.00 per round-turn.
So a raw cTrader account at 0.0 to 0.1 pips plus $6 commission runs roughly $6 to $7 all in. Every figure here traces to the cost tables in each broker’s section above.
A trader who closes before the session end avoids swap entirely. For positions held overnight, swap (the nightly rollover cost or credit) applies on every broker here.
On EUR/USD, the long-side swap runs roughly -$0.30 to -$0.60 per standard lot per day in the current rate environment. The short side is often positive or near zero.
MENA traders using Islamic swap-free accounts at FP Markets, Pepperstone, IC Markets, and others avoid these charges entirely, usually with no expiry cap on qualifying accounts.
The headline cTrader spread is only part of the cost. Three line items catch traders out:
cTrader is the reason this list exists, so it is worth being precise about what you gain and what you give up versus MetaTrader. The platform is identical software across every broker here. What differs is the liquidity behind it and which other platforms you can run alongside.
The table below shows which brokers pair cTrader with other platforms, since running cTrader and MT5 under one login is a genuine advantage.
| Broker | cTrader account | Other platforms under one login |
|---|---|---|
| FP Markets | Raw ECN | MT4, MT5, IRESS |
| Pepperstone | Razor | MT4, MT5, TradingView |
| Fusion Markets | Zero | MT4, MT5 |
| IC Markets | Raw Spread | MT4, MT5 |
| FxPro | Raw+ | MT4, MT5, FxPro platform |
| BlackBull Markets | ECN Prime | MT4, MT5, TradingView |
| GO Markets | GO Plus+ (AU) | MT4, MT5, TradingView |
| Skilling | Premium | MT4, Skilling Trader |
| Deriv | Deriv cTrader | Deriv MT5, Deriv X |
| VT Markets | Raw ECN | MT4, MT5 |
The one honest caveat: automation does not carry over. If your workflow is built on MetaTrader EAs, they will not run on cTrader without a rewrite into C#.
That single fact is the biggest reason MT4-native algo traders hesitate to switch, and it is worth weighing before you move. For the MetaTrader-first alternative, see our best MT4 brokers ranking.
The ranking tells you which broker is strongest overall. This section tells you which is strongest for you, which is a different question. Find the line that matches your situation:
Beginner who wants cTrader on a safe book: Go with FP Markets ($100, three regulators) or Pepperstone ($0, six regulators).
Cost-obsessed scalper: Fusion Markets Zero at about $5.20 per lot is the cheapest cTrader account tested.
Algo trader running cBots: IC Markets for the deepest cTrader liquidity and free VPS on volume.
Trader who wants platform choice: FxPro runs cTrader, MT4, MT5, and its own platform under one login.
EU or UK trader needing a compensation scheme: Prioritise a broker that onboards you onto an FCA or CySEC entity: Pepperstone, FP Markets, FxPro, or IC Markets.
Australian trader: GO Markets offers cTrader on a genuine ASIC book at a low cost, and FP Markets, Pepperstone, and IC Markets all hold ASIC too.
Lowest possible entry: Deriv at a $5 minimum is the cheapest cTrader door, useful for testing the platform with tiny real capital before you scale.
For the broader picture beyond cTrader specifically, our best ECN forex brokers and best low-spread forex brokers rankings cover the same execution-first names on wider criteria.
Most brokers that lose people money do not look obviously dangerous. They look polished, regulated, and generous. Here is what to watch for before you fund a cTrader account.
The “we have cTrader” bait. Some brokers advertise cTrader in a comparison table but no longer offer it, or reserve it for an offshore entity only. I found several names that claim cTrader while running MT4 in practice. Confirm the live account exists in your region before you open it, not just that the logo appears on a page.
The offshore-versus-tier-1 trap. This is the most important one. A broker can hold an FCA or ASIC licence and still route clients from certain countries onto an offshore book with no compensation scheme.
The homepage shows the tier-1 logo; the client agreement names a Vanuatu, Seychelles, or Belize company. Always read the registered entity on your agreement, not the logo on the website, because the protection follows the entity.
Hidden costs that do not show in the raw spread. A 0.0 pip cTrader spread means nothing on its own. Check the commission, the swap on overnight positions, any VPS fee below the free-tier volume, and currency conversion on non-base funding. The all-in cost per lot is the only honest comparison.
Regulator shopping and clone firms. Be wary of a broker licensed only in a light-touch jurisdiction, or one quoting a genuine firm’s FCA number while operating as an unrelated company. The fix is the same one-minute check every time: search the regulator’s own register, confirm the company name matches exactly, and confirm the status reads authorised or active. A licence number with no matching public entry is the clearest signal to walk away.
Withdrawal friction. A broker that makes deposits instant and withdrawals slow, or that suddenly demands new documents only when you try to take money out, is showing you its priorities. I run multiple withdrawal cycles on every broker I review precisely because this is where bad actors reveal themselves.
For most cTrader traders, FP Markets is the pick I would start with: cTrader native on a Raw ECN book, three regulators led by ASIC, and an all-in cost near $6 per lot. It is the broker on this list we partner with, and I have said so plainly, but it also genuinely fits a cTrader-first trader better than any other regulated name here.
If cost is everything, Fusion Markets is the cheapest cTrader venue at roughly $5.20 per lot, on the honest understanding that most clients sit on an offshore book. If you want the broadest tier-1 protection, Pepperstone carries six regulators and pairs cTrader with TradingView. And if you trade the order book or run cBots, IC Markets has the deepest cTrader liquidity in the group.
Below those, the list spreads into specialists: FxPro for platform choice, BlackBull for cTrader plus TradingView breadth, GO Markets for Australian clients, Skilling and Deriv for a gentle, low-cost start, and VT Markets for raw-spread mobile trading with a caution flag on its offshore routing.
Whichever you choose, do the one thing that matters more than any ranking: open the client agreement, read the registered entity, and confirm the licence on the public register before you deposit. The cTrader logo is identical across every broker here.
The protection behind your account is not, and that is a 60-second check no platform can replace. The full scoring is on the methodology page, and our commercial disclosures are on the how we make money page.
Our pick: FP Markets for cTrader native on a regulated ASIC Raw ECN book at roughly $6 per lot. Fusion Markets for the cheapest cTrader cost at about $5.20 per lot if you accept an offshore book. Pepperstone for the broadest tier-1 stack, and IC Markets for the deepest cTrader liquidity if you trade the order book or run cBots. Verify every broker on the public register before you fund.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments. Between 74% and 89% of retail accounts lose money. Affiliate disclosure: how we earn. Reviewed by Laura West, last updated August 2026.
cTrader is a trading platform built by Spotware for no-dealing-desk brokers. Traders pick it over MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 for three reasons I confirmed in testing. First, it shows genuine depth-of-market, so you see the resting buy and sell orders at each price rather than a single quote. Second, its order entry is faster for manual scalping, with one-click ladder trading and partial-close buttons built in. Third, it separates the broker from the price feed, which is why it is popular with ECN brokers that route your order to the market instead of taking the other side. The trade-off is a smaller library of custom indicators than MT4, and automated strategies use cBots written in C# rather than MQL. For a manual scalper who values the order book, cTrader is usually the better home.
Fusion Markets was the cheapest cTrader venue in my 2026 testing. Its Zero account on cTrader averaged 0.1 pip on EUR/USD with a $4.50 round-turn commission, an all-in cost of roughly $5.20 per lot. That undercuts the tier-1 raw group (FP Markets, Pepperstone, IC Markets) which sit near $6 to $7 all in. Fusion also charges no minimum deposit, so you can fund it with whatever you plan to trade. The catch is regulation: Fusion holds ASIC at home but routes most non-Australian clients to an offshore VFSC or Seychelles entity with no statutory compensation scheme. If the last dollar of cost matters more than a UK or EU compensation fund, Fusion wins on price. If protection matters more, FP Markets or Pepperstone cost a little more and give you a tier-1 book.
cTrader is a platform, not a broker, so its safety depends on which broker you connect it to. The software itself is a mature, audited product from Spotware, used by hundreds of regulated brokers, and it does not hold your money. Your deposit sits with the broker, under whichever legal entity your client agreement names. That is the number that matters. A cTrader account at an FCA or ASIC broker like Pepperstone or FP Markets carries segregated client money, negative balance protection, and a compensation scheme. The same cTrader software at an offshore-only broker gives you the identical interface with none of that backstop. So the platform is safe, but check the broker behind it: find the registered entity, then confirm the licence on the regulator's own public register before you fund.
Yes, but they are called cBots, not Expert Advisors, and they are written in C# inside cTrader Automate rather than in MQL. If you already own MetaTrader EAs, they will not run on cTrader without being rewritten. That is the single biggest reason MT4-native algo traders hesitate to switch. The upside is that cTrader Automate is a modern development environment with a visual backtester, and C# is a more capable language than MQL for complex logic. Every broker on this list that offers cTrader supports cBots, and most (IC Markets, Pepperstone, FP Markets, Fusion) also give free or discounted VPS hosting on qualifying volume so your bot runs close to the server. If your whole workflow is built on MT4 EAs, weigh the rewrite cost before you move. If you are starting fresh with automation, cTrader Automate is a strong platform to learn.
Yes. IC Markets is arguably the reference cTrader broker, and it was the most heavily cTrader-focused review in my whole sample. Its Raw Spread account runs on cTrader with a 0.0 pip raw spread on EUR/USD and a $6 round-turn commission, plus MT4 and MT5 as alternatives. What sets IC Markets apart on cTrader specifically is liquidity depth: it aggregates a large number of tier-1 bank and non-bank feeds, so the depth-of-market ladder is genuinely populated rather than thin. In my execution tests the fills were fast with no dealing-desk rejection on tick-scalping orders. IC Markets holds ASIC (AFSL 335692) and CySEC (362/18), with most non-EU, non-Australian clients routed to its Seychelles entity. The $200 minimum deposit is higher than Fusion or Pepperstone, so it is not the cheapest door in, but for cTrader order-book trading it is the specialist.
It depends on your workflow, and I would not call either strictly better. cTrader wins on order entry and transparency: full depth-of-market, one-click ladder trading, partial closes, and a cleaner separation between broker and price feed. MT5 wins on ecosystem: a far larger library of custom indicators and Expert Advisors, a built-in economic calendar, and hedging plus netting account modes. For a manual scalper who trades the order book and wants the fastest click-to-fill, cTrader is the better tool. For a trader who relies on a specific MT5 EA, an established indicator set, or multi-asset symbols beyond forex, MT5 is hard to leave. Several brokers here (FP Markets, IC Markets, FxPro, Go Markets) run both side by side under one login, so you do not have to choose a broker to choose a platform. Open a demo of each and trade a week on both before you commit real money.
It varies by broker, and the range on this list is wide. Fusion Markets, Pepperstone, BlackBull, and Go Markets charge no minimum at all, so you can start a live cTrader account with whatever you intend to trade. FP Markets, FxPro, Skilling, and VT Markets ask for $100. IC Markets sets the highest bar in this group at $200 for its Raw account, and Deriv the lowest that still has a floor at $5. My advice for a beginner: ignore the marketing minimum and fund only what you can afford to lose while you learn, then scale up once your strategy is proven on a demo and a small live account. A $0 minimum does not mean you should trade under-capitalised, and a $200 minimum does not make a broker better. Match the deposit to your risk plan, not to the broker's floor.
On a raw or ECN cTrader account, yes, and that is by design. cTrader is built for no-dealing-desk pricing, so the broker shows you a near-zero raw spread and charges a separate flat commission per lot instead of widening the spread. Across this list the commission runs from about $4.50 round-turn at Fusion Markets to $7 at IC Markets and Pepperstone, with FP Markets and Go Markets near $5 to $6. The right way to compare is all-in cost per lot, not the headline spread or the commission alone: add the average spread in dollars to the commission. A 0.1 pip spread equals $1 per standard lot, so a raw account at 0.1 pip plus $6 commission is roughly $7 all in. Some brokers also offer a commission-free standard account on cTrader with a wider spread, which can be cheaper for low-volume swing traders.
FP Markets is my top pick for a cTrader account, and it is the broker on this list I partner with. It supports cTrader natively on its Raw ECN account, which most ASIC brokers do not, alongside MT4, MT5, and IRESS under one relationship. The Raw account runs a 0.0 pip raw spread with $3 per side commission, roughly $6 round-turn, which is competitive with IC Markets and Pepperstone. It holds three regulators: ASIC (AFSL 286354) at home, CySEC (371/18, ICF up to 20,000 euro) for EU clients, and FSCA in South Africa. In my withdrawal testing, Skrill payouts cleared the same business day across four cycles. It is a strong fit for Australian, UK, South African, and UAE traders who want cTrader on a genuinely regulated Australian book rather than an offshore one. The full breakdown is in my FP Markets review.
Yes. cTrader has a native copy-trading module, cTrader Copy, that lets you follow a strategy provider directly inside the platform with a published performance history before you commit. This is separate from third-party services and is available at most brokers here that run cTrader, including IC Markets, Pepperstone, and FxPro. Skilling also leans into copy trading as a core feature. The advantage of cTrader Copy over bolt-on copy services is transparency: you see the provider's real drawdown, return, and trade history inside the same platform you trade on, and you can detach and take manual control at any time. If copy trading is your main reason for opening an account, check which specific brokers expose cTrader Copy in your region, since availability varies by entity. For a broader copy-trading comparison across platforms, see our best copy trading brokers guide.
For a beginner who specifically wants cTrader, I would point you to FP Markets or Pepperstone. Both pair the platform with a tier-1 licence, so your money sits under real oversight while you learn, and Pepperstone has no minimum deposit while FP Markets starts at $100. cTrader itself is arguably friendlier for a new manual trader than MT4, because the one-click order entry and the visible order book make what is happening under the price clearer. That said, be honest about the automation gap: if a beginner's plan involves buying ready-made MT4 robots, cTrader is the wrong platform, since those will not run. Start on a demo, trade the platform for a week, and only fund a live account once the interface feels natural. Skilling is a gentler third option with a commission-free standard tier and a lower learning curve, though on a lighter regulatory stack.
Yes. Pepperstone offers cTrader on its Razor account alongside MT4, MT5, and TradingView, all under one login. On cTrader the Razor account averaged 0.1 pip on EUR/USD in my testing with a $3.50 per side commission, roughly $7 round-turn all in. Pepperstone is also the most heavily regulated broker in this comparison, holding FCA (684312) in the UK, ASIC (AFSL 414530) in Australia, and four more licences covering the EU, Dubai, Germany, and the Bahamas. That breadth is why it scores 9.0 overall. For a cTrader scalper who wants the platform on a broad tier-1 stack with same-day withdrawals, Pepperstone is one of the two or three strongest choices here. Its main trade-off against Fusion or IC Markets is cost: at $7 round-turn it is not the cheapest, though the regulatory depth arguably justifies the small premium. Full detail is in my Pepperstone review.
No, and this is the most important thing to check before you fund. cTrader brokers span the full regulatory spectrum. Pepperstone, FP Markets, FxPro, and IC Markets hold tier-1 licences (FCA, ASIC, or CySEC) with compensation schemes on their onshore entities. Others, like Fusion Markets, BlackBull, and VT Markets, hold one strong licence at home but route most international clients to offshore entities (VFSC Vanuatu, Seychelles, or similar) that carry no statutory compensation. Deriv operates mainly under MFSA Malta and offshore Labuan and Vanuatu books. The platform is identical across all of them; the protection behind your account is not. Always open the client agreement, find the exact legal entity that will hold your money, and confirm that licence on the regulator's own public register. The cTrader logo on the homepage tells you nothing about who is holding your deposit.
No. cTrader is free to use at every broker on this list, and there is no platform-side fee to download the desktop app, the web version, or the mobile app. What you pay is the trading cost: the spread plus any commission on a raw or ECN account, exactly as you would on MetaTrader. A few brokers offer premium data add-ons or VPS hosting for a fee, but the core platform, including depth-of-market and cTrader Automate for cBots, is included at no charge. Be careful not to confuse platform cost with trading cost. Two brokers running the same free cTrader software can charge very different amounts per lot, which is why the all-in cost per round-turn is the figure to compare, not whether the platform itself is free. Every broker here bundles cTrader at no extra platform charge.
Ready to pick?
60 forex brokers tested by Laura West · Last updated August 21, 2026
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider category.