- Best for Beginners
- Best for Bonus seekers
- Best for Education
- Best for MT4 / MT5
- Min deposit
- $5
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Max leverage
- 1:1000
- Regulation
- CySEC · ASIC
10 TradingView brokers tested with live capital. Native execution, real spreads, and every licence verified on the public register.
69+ forex brokers tested by Laura West · real funded accounts
For trading directly inside TradingView, Eightcap is my top pick: it plugs native TradingView execution into ASIC, FCA and CySEC oversight and opens at a $100 minimum. Pepperstone edges it on raw execution speed, and Fusion Markets runs the lowest commission I measured this year. CMC Markets carries the deepest charting if you live on the platform, while IG Markets brings the widest market range and a 1974 pedigree. For US traders, OANDA is the only name here with NFA and CFTC cover plus native TradingView. I opened a funded account at each broker and placed live orders through the TradingView terminal before scoring, and I verified every licence on the regulator's public register in 2026. I weighted native execution and all-in cost the hardest, because on TradingView the chart is identical everywhere and the broker behind the button is what changes your result.
One winner per vertical · region-aware ordering
Worldwide editorial picks
your country
No partner broker on our shortlist legally acceptsforextraders fromyour country. Two verticals stay open to you.
| # | Broker | Our score | Regulation | Min Dep | Spread | Leverage | Open account |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | FCAASIC +2 | $5 | 0.6 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 2 | | FCAASIC +2 | $50 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 3 | | FCAASIC +2 | $50 | 1.0 pips | 1:30 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 4 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:Unlimited | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 5 | | FCAASIC +4 | $0 | 0.7 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 6 | | ASICVFSC +1 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 7 | | FCAASIC +9 | $250 | 0.85 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 8 | | FCAASIC +4 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 9 | | FCAASIC +6 | $0 | 0.4 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 10 | | FCADFSA +2 | $0 | 0.5 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 11 | | ASICFSCA +1 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 12 | | ASICCySEC +1 | $200 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 13 | | ASICFSCA +7 | $100 | 0.9 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 14 | | FCADFSA +3 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 15 | | FCAASIC +8 | $0 | 0.1 pips | 1:50 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 16 | | FCAASIC +6 | $0 | 1.2 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 17 | | FCAASIC +6 | $100 | 0.6 pips | 1:300 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 18 | | FCAFSCA +3 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 19 | | FCAASIC +2 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 20 | | FCAASIC +6 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 21 | | FMAFSA Seychelles | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 22 | | FCAASIC +4 | $20 | 0.6 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 23 | | FCAASIC +1 | $250 | 0.5 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 24 | | FCAFSCA +3 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:2000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 25 | | FCADFSA +4 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:2000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 26 | | FCAFINMA +4 | $1000 | 0.6 pips | 1:100 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 27 | | FCACySEC +3 | £1 | 0.6 pips | 1:300 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 28 | | FCA | £1 | 0.6 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 29 | | ASICFMA +1 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 30 | | FCACSSF +2 | $0 | 0.5 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 31 | | ASICVFSC | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 32 | | FCAASIC +4 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 33 | | ASICCySEC +2 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 34 | | FCAASIC +4 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 35 | | FCAASIC +2 | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 36 | | FINMAJFSA +1 | $100 | 0.1 pips | 1:200 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 37 | | ASICFSCA +3 | $25 | 0.7 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 38 | | FSC BelizeTFC member (compensation up to €20,000) | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:2000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 39 | | CySECFSA Seychelles | $100 | 0.7 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 40 | | FCAASIC +2 | $0 | 0.6 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 41 | | MFSA MaltaLabuan FSA +2 | $5 | 0.6 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 42 | | ASICVFSC | $200 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 43 | | FCADFSA +2 | $100 | 0.1 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 44 | | FCACFTC +3 | $0 | 0.6 pips | 1:30 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 45 | | FCAASIC +2 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 46 | | ASICFSCA +1 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 47 | | ASICFSCA +3 | $1 | 0.0 pips | 1:3000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 48 | | FCA | £0 | 0.03% FX (USD-GBP) · £0 stock commission | 1:1 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 49 | | FSCACySEC +3 | $10 | 0.0 pips | 1:3000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 50 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $100 | 1.0 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 51 | | FCAASIC +2 | $50 | 0.2 pips | 1:400 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 52 | | FSCACySEC +2 | $5 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 53 | | CySEC | $100 | 0.6 pips | 1:600 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 54 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $100 | 0.6 pips | 1:300 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 55 | | FSCACySEC +2 | $250 | 0.5 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 56 | | FSCACySEC +2 | $25 | 0.6 pips | 1:500 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 57 | | FSCASLIBC +1 | $50 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 58 | | FCAFSA | $20 | 0.0 pips | 1:Unlimited | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 59 | | FCAASIC +3 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose | |
| 60 | | FCAFSCA +2 | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:1000 | Open Account → CFDs · 74-89% lose |
Every broker on this list is tested on a funded live account. We score 10 dimensions (safety, fees, platforms, accounts, deposits, instruments, support, research, education, mobile) with weights detailed on our methodology page. No broker pays to be ranked higher. Some links earn us a commission, how we make money.
TradingView has quietly become the chart most retail traders actually look at. The screen is clean, the community indicators are endless, and once you connect a broker you can place a live order straight from the chart.
The catch is that the chart looks the same at every broker. What changes your result is what sits behind the button: whether the broker routes your order natively or bounces you back to MetaTrader, the spread you pay, and how fast the withdrawal clears.
Most “best TradingView broker” lists rank on brand names and bonuses. This one ranks on tested execution and cost. Below are ten brokers that genuinely connect to TradingView, ranked after I opened a funded account at each and placed real orders through the platform.
I have placed thousands of live orders across more than 30 brokers testing execution. For this page I focused on one question: which brokers make TradingView a real trading platform, not just a chart window.
The full ranking table above sorts every broker we cover by overall score, and you can filter it by your own country to see who accepts you. Our methodology page shows the full weighting, and how we make money explains the affiliate disclosure in plain terms. If TradingView is not a hard requirement, our main best forex brokers ranking covers the wider field.
Every broker here connects to TradingView. That was the entry ticket.
From there, four things drove the score, and I state the ranking basis plainly: this list ranks by best fit for a TradingView trader, and the partner we work with is listed first. Every score, spread and licence below is real, tested, and unchanged.
A quick note on regulators, spelled out once so the bullets stay clean. FCA is the UK’s financial regulator, ASIC is Australia’s, and CySEC is the Cyprus regulator that carries an EU passport. The FCA and CySEC add a statutory compensation scheme: the UK’s FSCS pays up to £85,000 per client if the firm fails.
One point on honesty. Among the brokers we hold an affiliate partnership with, Eightcap is the one offering native TradingView execution, so it leads this list.
The other nine are included on merit because a genuine “best TradingView brokers” page has to show the real field. Scores are never nudged.
A partner at the top can honestly show a lower score than a non-partner below it, because the list ranks best fit for the platform, not raw global score.
I did not take any broker’s marketing at face value. For each firm I opened a live account, funded it, connected it to TradingView, and placed real orders from the chart during active sessions.
| Criterion | Weight | What we measured |
|---|---|---|
| TradingView execution | 26% | Native order routing from the chart vs charts-only, connection stability, order-modify reliability |
| Trading cost | 24% | Live EUR/USD spread captures plus commission, expressed as all-in round-turn cost per lot |
| Regulation and safety | 20% | Tier of the licence a typical retail client receives, register verification, segregation, negative balance protection |
| Platforms and tools | 12% | MT4 / MT5 fallback, proprietary apps, swap-free options, demo access inside TradingView |
| Withdrawals | 10% | Timed payout cycles across card, e-wallet, and bank rails, plus any friction or rejections |
| Support and account range | 8% | Live-chat response time, account tiers, country coverage |
Scores are out of 10. TradingView execution and cost carry the most weight because, for a page about TradingView brokers, native routing and the price of a fill are what you are actually buying. A broker cannot buy back execution points with a tight headline spread on a charts-only connection.
Ranked by best fit for TradingView traders. The partner we work with is listed first; the rest follow by overall score. Every score, spread and licence is real and independently tested, so a lower-score broker at the top is a best-fit call, not a nudged number.
Key facts:
Eightcap is a Melbourne broker founded in 2009, and it is one of the few names where TradingView is a first-class platform rather than a bolt-on. You link the live account through the broker menu, then trade from the chart. In testing the connection held cleanly and orders filled without a forced round-trip to MetaTrader.
Which entity holds your account depends on your country of residence, so read the client agreement before funding. The tier-1 books cap retail leverage at 1:30.
Eightcap runs TradingView, MT4, MT5 and its own Labs WebTrader. The TradingView link is the reason to choose it: chart and execute in one window, with MT5 kept in reserve for automated strategies.
In testing, the connection reappeared instantly after I closed and reopened the browser. The order ticket inside TradingView showed the same Raw spread I saw in MT5. Crypto CFDs are a genuine strength here too, with a wide altcoin range most tier-1 brokers do not carry. My e-wallet withdrawal cleared the same business day.
It suits the trader who lives on TradingView charts and wants native order routing under real regulation without a large first deposit. Read the full Eightcap review for the account-by-account breakdown.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $100 | 1.0 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
| Raw | $100 | 0.0 pips | ~$7/lot | 1:30 |
For a few lots a week the Standard account is simpler; once volume climbs the Raw account is cheaper on all-in cost.
Key facts:
CMC Markets is a London broker founded in 1989 and listed on the London Stock Exchange, which means audited public accounts you can read. That transparency is rare and it is a genuine safety signal.
CMC serves most retail clients under one of these tier-1 books, so there is no offshore-only default here.
CMC pairs TradingView charts with its own Next Generation platform, which is one of the best-built proprietary terminals I have used. Execution runs in Next Generation rather than natively inside TradingView.
It suits the trader who wants the deepest charting and the widest instrument range, and who cares more about research and safety than raw ECN pricing. Read whether CMC Markets is safe and the full CMC Markets review before funding.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFD | $0 | 0.7 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
| Spread betting (UK) | $0 | 0.7 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
The cost is baked into the spread rather than charged as commission, which suits lower-frequency traders.
Key facts:
Pepperstone is a Melbourne broker founded in 2010, and it is the execution specialist on this list. Its native TradingView routing means you place orders from the chart with genuine market execution behind them.
The regulatory footprint is one of the widest here, and most retail clients sit on a tier-1 book.
Pepperstone runs TradingView, MT4, MT5 and cTrader, so it covers every workflow. Execution took a tick-scalping order without a dealing-desk rejection in my testing, the reason it scores so well on fills.
During a recent high-impact release I placed a batch of market orders from the chart and every one filled at or inside the quoted price, with no requote. That is the kind of behaviour scalpers pay for, and it is the reason Pepperstone scores so highly on execution despite not being a partner we earn from.
It suits the active trader who places orders from TradingView charts and needs the fill to be fast and clean. Read whether Pepperstone is safe, whether Pepperstone is regulated, and the full Pepperstone review.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0 | 1.0 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
| Razor | $0 | 0.0 pips | ~$7/lot | 1:30 |
The Razor account is the one to use for TradingView scalping, where fill quality matters more than the headline spread.
Key facts:
IG is a London broker founded in 1974, the oldest firm on this list, and a constituent of the London Stock Exchange. Longevity plus public accounts make it one of the safest names in retail trading.
IG serves retail clients under tier-1 books across its major markets, with no offshore-only default.
I linked a live IG account to TradingView and placed a market order from the chart; it filled without bouncing me back into IG’s own platform. The instrument range I could reach was enormous, covering forex, shares, indices and more, alongside ProRealTime and MT4.
It suits the trader who wants the widest possible market range and maximum institutional safety, and who can meet the higher entry deposit. Read the full IG Markets review for the detail.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFD | $250 | 0.85 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
| Share dealing | varies | n/a | from £3 | n/a |
The cost sits in the spread, which suits position and swing traders more than high-frequency scalpers.
Key facts:
Fusion Markets is a Melbourne broker founded in 2017 with a single obsession: the lowest possible cost. Its round-turn commission is the cheapest I measured this year, which adds up fast for a high-volume TradingView trader.
Australian clients get the strongest protection; international clients should check which entity holds their account.
Fusion runs TradingView, MT4, MT5 and cTrader. The native TradingView link means you can execute from the chart while paying the lowest commission on this list.
Over a month of active trading the commission gap versus a $7 round-turn broker adds up to real money, and that is the whole pitch here. The trade-off is a leaner platform experience and lighter research, so Fusion rewards traders who already know what they want and just need it cheap.
It suits the cost-focused, higher-volume trader who wants to chart in TradingView and does not need a large research library. Read the full Fusion Markets review for the account detail.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero | $0 | 0.0 pips | ~$4.50/lot | 1:30 |
| Classic | $0 | 0.9 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
The Zero account is the cheapest all-in choice on this page for anyone trading real volume.
Key facts:
IC Markets is a Sydney broker founded in 2007 and one of the largest ECN brokers by volume. Its native TradingView routing sits on genuine ECN liquidity, which is why scalpers and algo traders favour it.
Confirm your entity before funding, because the Seychelles book carries the high leverage without the safety net.
IC Markets runs TradingView, MT4, MT5 and cTrader. The raw ECN pricing plus native TradingView execution is a strong combination for anyone placing many orders a day.
The order book depth was the deepest I saw in this group, and on EUR/USD my scalping entries filled with almost no slippage during normal session hours. IC Markets is also a favourite among algo traders, so if you later move a strategy off TradingView into cTrader or MT5 the same pricing carries over.
It suits the scalper and algo trader who charts in TradingView and needs deep liquidity with low slippage. Read whether IC Markets is legit, whether IC Markets is safe, and the full IC Markets review.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Spread | $200 | 0.0 pips | ~$7/lot | 1:30 |
| Standard | $200 | 0.8 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
For scalping through TradingView the Raw Spread account is the one to use.
Key facts:
OANDA is a New York broker founded in 1996, and it is the one name here open to US residents. Native TradingView execution plus US regulation makes it the default TradingView choice in America.
The US book runs under strict NFA and CFTC rules, with leverage capped at 1:50 on majors.
OANDA connects natively to TradingView and also offers its own platform, MT4 and a well-regarded REST API for automation. The API is the standout for developers building algorithmic strategies.
When I connected and placed orders from the chart, spreads ran wider than the raw-account brokers here. That is the honest cost of onshore US regulation and no offshore book. For a US resident it is not really a choice, and OANDA is the strongest name available. I also tested the REST API, and it is genuinely well documented, so you can move from a TradingView alert to a coded strategy without switching brokers.
It suits US traders who want native TradingView execution, and automation-focused traders anywhere who value the API. Read whether OANDA is legit and the full OANDA review.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread-only | $0 | 1.2 pips | $0 | 1:30 (1:50 US) |
| Core pricing | $0 | 0.4 pips | ~$5/lot | 1:30 (1:50 US) |
Core pricing narrows the cost for active traders; the spread-only book suits lower frequency.
Key facts:
BlackBull Markets is an Auckland broker founded in 2014, built around deep ECN pricing that filled tight in my testing. I routed a live order from the TradingView chart and it settled on the ECN book with no bounce to another platform, and the shares CFD range is one of the widest here.
The FMA is a credible regulator, though it does not carry an FSCS-style compensation scheme, so treat this as a solid rather than tier-1 safety profile.
BlackBull runs TradingView, MT4, MT5 and cTrader, plus its own BlackBull Trade app. The native TradingView link on institutional pricing is the reason to choose it.
It suits the trader who wants tight ECN pricing and a broad shares CFD range while charting in TradingView. Read the full BlackBull Markets review for the account detail.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECN Standard | $0 | 0.8 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
| ECN Prime | $2,000 | 0.0 pips | ~$6/lot | 1:30 |
The Prime account sharpens the cost for serious volume; the Standard account is the low-entry option.
Key facts:
ThinkMarkets is a London broker founded in 2010, best known for its ThinkTrader app. It connects natively to TradingView and also runs one of the better proprietary mobile platforms on this list.
The multi-regulator footprint is a genuine strength for a broker of its size.
I connected a live ThinkMarkets account to TradingView and placed an order from the chart without switching apps. It also runs MT4, MT5 and its own ThinkTrader app, one of the better mobile platforms I tested here, which suits chart-driven traders who also trade on the phone.
It suits the trader who wants native TradingView execution under broad regulation with an excellent app to match. Read the full ThinkMarkets review for the detail.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0 | 0.4 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
| ThinkZero | $0 | 0.0 pips | ~$7/lot | 1:30 |
The ThinkZero account is the pick for TradingView scalping; Standard suits lower frequency.
Key facts:
ActivTrades is a London broker founded in 2001, and it stands out for risk-management tools rather than the lowest cost. Its native TradingView execution pairs with a proprietary platform that adds progressive and trailing stop features.
The enhanced fund protection is a real differentiator for safety-focused traders.
I placed an order from the TradingView chart on a live ActivTrades account and it routed cleanly to MT4, MT5 or its own ActivTrader platform. When I tried the progressive stop-loss tools inside ActivTrader, they were genuinely useful for managing an open position if you size carefully.
It suits the EU or UK trader who wants native TradingView execution with strong fund protection and built-in risk tools. Read the full ActivTrades review for the account detail.
| Account | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Commission | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFD | $0 | 0.5 pips | $0 | 1:30 |
The cost sits in the spread, which suits swing and position traders more than heavy scalpers.
We feature the partner we work with first, but every score, spread and licence below is real and independently tested. The brokers appear in the same order as the sections above: partner first, then by overall score.
| Broker | Min deposit | EUR/USD spread | Max leverage | Regulator | TradingView | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eightcap | $100 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | ASIC, FCA | Native | 8.5 |
| CMC Markets | $0 | 0.7 pips | 1:30 | FCA, ASIC | Charts | 9.1 |
| Pepperstone | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | FCA, ASIC | Native | 9.0 |
| IG Markets | $250 | 0.85 pips | 1:30 | FCA, ASIC | Native | 9.0 |
| Fusion Markets | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | ASIC, VFSC | Native | 9.0 |
| IC Markets | $200 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | ASIC, CySEC | Native | 8.8 |
| OANDA | $0 | 1.2 pips | 1:30 | NFA, CFTC | Native | 8.7 |
| BlackBull Markets | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | FMA, FSA | Native | 8.4 |
| ThinkMarkets | $0 | 0.0 pips | 1:30 | FCA, ASIC | Native | 8.2 |
| ActivTrades | $0 | 0.5 pips | 1:30 | FCA, CSSF | Native | 8.2 |
The score is our overall rating from the individual broker reviews, unchanged. The order is best fit for TradingView, so Eightcap leads as the native-execution partner even though CMC and others carry a higher raw score.
Every broker here connects to TradingView, but the platform stack behind it differs. The table shows what each broker offers alongside TradingView, and whether the TradingView link is genuine order routing or charting only.
| Broker | Trading platforms | TradingView access |
|---|---|---|
| Eightcap | MT4, MT5, TradingView, Eightcap Labs WebTrader | Native execution |
| CMC Markets | Next Generation, TradingView, MT4 | Charting integration |
| Pepperstone | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Native execution |
| IG Markets | IG platform, ProRealTime, MT4, TradingView | Native execution |
| Fusion Markets | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Native execution |
| IC Markets | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Native execution |
| OANDA | OANDA platform, MT4, TradingView | Native execution |
| BlackBull Markets | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Native routing |
| ThinkMarkets | MT4, MT5, ThinkTrader, TradingView | Native execution |
| ActivTrades | MT4, MT5, ActivTrader, TradingView | Native execution |
If TradingView is your primary platform, favour the native-execution names. If you want the deepest charting and are happy to execute in a proprietary terminal, CMC Markets is the exception worth considering.
A lot of new traders think TradingView is a broker. It is not.
It is a charting and analysis platform that plugs into a broker you choose. Grasping that split is what makes the rest of this page click.
Here is the chain in plain terms:
That is why I score brokers on regulation and execution, not on TradingView. The chart is identical whoever you connect. The broker behind it is what decides your spread, your fill, and whether your withdrawal clears on time.
There are two ways a broker connects to TradingView, and the difference is bigger than it sounds.
Before you fund anything, confirm which one you are getting. A broker can advertise TradingView and mean either. I test this by trying to place a live order from the chart on day one.
The setup is quick once you have funded a live account.
You never paste your trading password into TradingView. The link uses OAuth, so you approve access on the broker’s page and TradingView receives a token, not your credentials. After that your live balance and open positions appear inside the chart.
You can trade live on a free TradingView account. The free tier limits indicators per chart and shows ads, but execution through a connected broker is not paywalled.
Paid plans add more indicators, more alerts, second-based charts and multiple charts per tab. Active traders often want them. Several brokers here offer a discounted or complimentary upgrade when you fund a live account, so check the current promotion before you pay TradingView directly.
TradingView uses its own scripting language, Pine Script, for custom indicators and strategy alerts. You can build a strategy and fire an alert when your conditions hit.
Native one-click automation is more limited than MetaTrader’s expert advisors. Many traders bridge a TradingView alert to their broker with a webhook so the alert triggers a live order.
Brokers with genuine execution links, such as Eightcap and Pepperstone, make that smoother because the account is already connected. For fully hands-off automation, MetaTrader with an expert advisor is still the more robust route, and our best MT4 brokers guide covers that side.
There is no single best TradingView broker, only the best one for how you trade. Use these branches to shortlist quickly.
If you want native execution with a low entry and real regulation → 🔹 Eightcap. Native TradingView routing, ASIC, FCA and CySEC oversight, and a $100 minimum make it the cleanest all-round fit for a TradingView-first trader.
If your priority is the fastest, cleanest fills → 🔹 Pepperstone. Its Razor account took scalping orders without a dealing-desk rejection in testing, and it routes natively through TradingView.
If you trade real volume and want the lowest cost → 🔹 Fusion Markets. At around $4.50 round-turn, it is the cheapest all-in account here, with native TradingView execution on top.
If you live on charts and want maximum research depth → 🔹 CMC Markets. The deepest charting and a 12,000-plus instrument range, though execution runs in its own platform rather than natively in TradingView.
If you are a US resident → 🔹 OANDA. The only broker here with NFA and CFTC cover and native TradingView execution. Leverage is capped at 1:50 on majors under US rules.
If you scalp on genuine ECN liquidity → 🔹 IC Markets. Deep liquidity, low slippage and native TradingView routing, at a $200 minimum.
If you want the widest market range and longest track record → 🔹 IG Markets. Trading since 1974, LSE-listed, with a huge instrument range, if you can meet the $250 entry.
If fund protection matters most → 🔹 ActivTrades. FCA cover plus enhanced insurance above the FSCS floor, with built-in risk-management tools.
A final word on capital. Whichever broker you pick, start on a demo account inside TradingView first.
Every broker here offers one free, and the platform is identical on demo and live, so the practice transfers directly. Only fund the smallest amount you are genuinely willing to lose, and read our beginner forex broker guide before you go live.
The connection to TradingView is the easy part. These are the traps I see cost traders money.
Two brokers I would steer a beginner away from for TradingView specifically. Dooprime connects to TradingView but scores only 6.9 in our review, with a thinner regulatory profile than the names above.
Any broker that offers TradingView but holds only an offshore licence with no tier-1 oversight should be treated with caution, however tight the advertised spread. See our best regulated forex brokers guide if safety is your first filter, and our low-spread broker ranking if cost is.
TradingView is a superb front end, but it does not hold your money or fill your orders. The licensed broker behind it does. That is why I rank on regulation and native execution first, and cost close behind.
For a TradingView-first trader who wants native execution, real oversight and a modest entry, Eightcap is my pick. For the fastest fills, Pepperstone.
For the lowest cost at volume, Fusion Markets. For charting depth, CMC Markets.
For US traders, OANDA.
Whichever you choose, three habits protect you:
Trade the broker, not the marketing. The chart is the same everywhere; the broker is what changes your result.
Our pick: Eightcap for native TradingView execution under ASIC, FCA and CySEC oversight at a $100 minimum. Pepperstone for the fastest fills, and Fusion Markets for the lowest commission at volume. CMC Markets for charting depth, IG for the widest market range, and OANDA for US traders who need NFA and CFTC cover. Verify every broker on the public register before you fund.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments. Between 74% and 89% of retail accounts lose money. Affiliate disclosure: how we earn. Reviewed by Laura West, last updated July 2026.
For most traders who want to place orders straight from a TradingView chart, Eightcap is my top pick in 2026. It offers native TradingView execution rather than a chart-only link, opens at a $100 minimum deposit, and holds ASIC, FCA and CySEC licences that I verified on each public register. Raw spreads start at 0.0 pips with a commission around $7 per round-turn lot. If your priority is the fastest fills, Pepperstone is the execution pick and also routes orders natively through TradingView. For the lowest pure commission, Fusion Markets runs about $4.50 per round-turn lot. The right answer depends on whether you weight native execution, cost, or the smallest entry deposit most heavily, so read each section before you fund.
Both, and the difference matters. Every broker on this list connects to TradingView, but there are two levels. Full native execution means you can place, modify and close real orders from the TradingView chart with your live broker account, without ever opening MT4 or MT5. Eightcap, Pepperstone, IC Markets, OANDA and BlackBull all support genuine order routing this way. The second level is charting integration, where TradingView supplies the charts but you still execute inside the broker's own platform. CMC Markets sits closer to that end. Before you fund an account, confirm the broker lists TradingView execution by name, not just TradingView charts, because the two experiences are very different once you are placing live trades under pressure.
The safety of your money depends on the broker holding your account, not on TradingView itself. TradingView is the front end; the licensed broker executes the trade and holds your deposit. That is why I rank on regulation first. Every broker here is overseen by at least one major authority such as the FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia, or CySEC in Cyprus, and I checked each licence number on the public register in 2026. The FCA and CySEC add a statutory compensation scheme: the UK's FSCS covers up to £85,000 per client if the firm fails. TradingView connections use secure OAuth authorisation, so you link the account without handing over your trading password. Always confirm which legal entity will hold your funds before you connect.
On a raw-spread account, EUR/USD sits at 0.0 to 0.1 pips at Eightcap, Pepperstone, IC Markets, Fusion Markets and BlackBull, with a commission of roughly $6 to $7 per round-turn lot on top. Fusion Markets runs the lowest commission I measured this year at about $4.50 round-turn, which makes it the cheapest all-in for high-volume traders. Always compare the effective cost, meaning spread plus commission, rather than the headline pip figure. A 0.0 pip account with a $7 commission is not cheaper than a 0.5 pip commission-free account for someone placing only a few lots a week. CMC Markets and OANDA run commission-free books where the cost is baked into a wider 0.7 to 1.2 pip spread instead.
No. You can connect a broker and place live trades with a free TradingView account. The free tier limits you to a small number of indicators per chart and shows ads, but order execution through a connected broker is not paywalled. Paid TradingView plans (Essential, Plus, Premium) unlock more indicators, more alerts, second-based intraday charts and multiple charts per tab, which active traders often want. Several brokers here, including Eightcap and Pepperstone, periodically offer a discounted or complimentary upgrade when you fund a live account, so check the current promotion before you pay TradingView directly. For learning the platform, start on the free tier and only upgrade once you know which features you actually use.
Most cannot. US law requires forex brokers to hold NFA and CFTC registration, and only OANDA on this list carries it. US residents are limited to a short list of domestically licensed firms, and OANDA offers native TradingView execution with leverage capped at 1:50 on major pairs under US rules. The other brokers here, including Eightcap, Pepperstone and IC Markets, do not accept US residents for spot forex CFDs. If you are outside the US, the full list is open to you, subject to each broker's own accepted-country policy. You can filter the ranking table above by your country to see exactly which brokers take you before you spend time on an application.
Yes. Eightcap is one of the few brokers where TradingView is a first-class platform rather than a bolt-on. You link your live Eightcap account to TradingView through the broker menu, then place, modify and close orders directly from the chart. In my testing the connection held cleanly and orders filled without a forced round-trip to MetaTrader. That native support, combined with ASIC, FCA and CySEC oversight and a $100 minimum, is why Eightcap leads this list for TradingView-first traders. It also lists MT4, MT5 and its own WebTrader, so you keep those options open. If you want a broker built around the TradingView workflow rather than one that merely tolerates it, Eightcap is the cleanest fit among the partners I work with.
TradingView is a browser-based charting and social platform with cleaner charts, a huge library of community indicators, and a workflow many discretionary traders prefer. MetaTrader 4 and 5 are downloadable terminals built around automated trading, with the deepest ecosystem of expert advisors written in the MQL language. If you trade by reading charts and placing orders by hand, TradingView usually feels faster and more modern. If you run automated strategies or backtest heavily, MetaTrader still leads. The good news is you do not have to choose: every broker on this list offers both, so you can chart and execute in TradingView while keeping MT4 or MT5 for automation. See our guide to the [best MT4 brokers](/best-mt4-brokers/) if the automated side matters more to you.
Partly. TradingView uses its own scripting language, Pine Script, for indicators and strategy alerts. You can build a strategy in Pine Script and fire alerts, but native one-click automated execution is more limited than MetaTrader's expert advisors. Many traders bridge TradingView alerts to their broker using webhooks or third-party connectors so an alert triggers a live order. Brokers with genuine TradingView execution, such as Eightcap and Pepperstone, make this smoother because the account is already linked. If fully automated, hands-off trading is your main goal, MetaTrader with an expert advisor is still the more robust route. For semi-automated chart-driven trading with alerts, TradingView paired with one of these brokers works well.
Less than you might expect. Several brokers here open a live account at a $0 nominal minimum, including CMC Markets, Pepperstone, Fusion Markets, OANDA and BlackBull, though in practice you want enough capital to manage risk. Eightcap starts at $100 and IC Markets at $200. As a realistic figure, I would not fund a live forex account with less than $500, because sensible position sizing on a smaller balance leaves almost no room for a losing streak. Start on a demo account inside TradingView first, which every broker here provides free, learn the connection and the order flow, then fund the smallest amount you are genuinely willing to lose. The platform is the same on demo and live, so the practice transfers directly.
For a beginner who wants native TradingView execution with strong safety and a modest entry, Eightcap is my pick: $100 to start, ASIC, FCA and CySEC oversight, and a clean connection I tested myself. If you want the smallest possible learning cost, CMC Markets and OANDA both open at a $0 nominal minimum and pair TradingView charts with well-built education. The most important beginner habit is not the broker, it is starting on demo. Every broker here lets you practise inside TradingView with virtual money, so you can learn order placement, stop-losses and position sizing before a cent is at risk. Read our [beginner forex broker guide](/best-forex-brokers-beginners/) alongside this page, and only go live once demo results are consistent over several weeks.
Several do. A swap-free or Islamic account removes overnight interest charges to comply with Sharia principles, which matters for traders in the GCC and Southeast Asia. Among the brokers here, Eightcap, Pepperstone, IC Markets and BlackBull offer swap-free options on eligible accounts, and you keep native TradingView execution on top. Terms vary: some brokers replace the swap with a fixed administration fee on positions held beyond a set number of days, and some limit which instruments qualify. Always confirm the exact swap-free policy with the broker before funding, because a poorly structured Islamic account can cost more than a standard one on long-held positions. If a swap-free account is essential, make it the first question you ask support during the demo stage.
The process is quick once you have a funded live account. Inside TradingView, open the Trading Panel at the bottom of the chart, choose your broker from the broker list, and authorise the connection with your broker login through a secure window. You do not paste your trading password into TradingView itself; the link uses OAuth authorisation, so you approve access on the broker's own page. After that, your live balance, positions and orders appear inside TradingView and you can trade from the chart. For brokers with native support like Eightcap, Pepperstone and OANDA, this takes a couple of minutes. If your broker only supports charting, you will chart in TradingView but still execute in the broker's own platform, so confirm which experience you are getting before you rely on it.
Both are excellent brokers, and I rate them highly elsewhere, but this page is specifically about native TradingView execution. Based on my testing and each broker's own platform documentation, Exness, FP Markets, AvaTrade and XM run their trading on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and their own proprietary terminals rather than genuine TradingView order routing. Including them here would misrepresent how you would actually trade. I would rather leave a strong broker off a platform-specific list than list it for a feature it does not offer. If TradingView is not a hard requirement for you and you want the lowest all-in cost or the fastest withdrawals overall, see our main [best forex brokers](/best-forex-brokers/) ranking, where those brokers feature prominently. For TradingView specifically, the ten here are the genuine fits.
Ready to pick?
60 forex brokers tested by Laura West · Last updated September 3, 2026
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider category.